National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0119 Sino-Iranica : vol.1
Sino-Iranica : vol.1 / Page 119 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000248
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

 

SESAME AND FLAX   293

admits that it is unknown what the hu ma spoken of in the Pen-tstao literature really is.

I have also prepared a translation of Li Si-hen's text on the subject, which Bretschneider refrained from translating; but, as there are several difficult botanical points which I am unable to elucidate, I prefer to leave this subject to a competent botanist. In substance Li Si-ben understands by hu ma the sesame, as follows from his use of the mod ern term ci ma BR *. He says that there are two crops, an early and a late one,' with black, white, or red seeds; but how he can state that the stems are all square is unintelligible. The criticism of the statements of his predecessors occupies much space, but I do not see that it enlightens us much. The best way out of this difficulty seems to me Stuart's suggestion that the Chinese account confounds Sesamum, Linum, and Mulgedium. The Japanese naturalist Ono Ranzan2 is of the same opinion. He says that there is no variety of sesame with red seed, as asserted by Li Si-ben (save that the black seeds of sesame are reddish in the immature stage), and infers that this is a species of Linum which always produces red seeds exclusively. Ono also states that there is a close correlation between the color of the seeds and the angles of the capsules: a white variety will always produce two or four-angled capsules, while hexangular and octangular capsules invariably contain only black seeds. Whether or in how for this is correct I do not know. The confusion of Sesamum and Linum arose from the common name hu ma, but unfortunately proves that the Chinese botanists, or rather pharmacists, were bookworms to a much higher degree than observers; for it is almost beyond comprehension how such radically distinct plants can be confounded by any one who has even once seen them. In view of this disconsolate situation, the historian can only beg to be excused.

7. It is a point of great culture-historical interest that the Chinese have never utilized the flax-fibre in the manufacture of textiles, but that hemp has always occupied this place from the time of their earliest antiquity.3 This is one of the points of fundamental diversity between East-Asiatic and Mediterranean civilizations,— there hemp, and here flax, as material for clothing. There are, further, two important facts to be considered in this connection,— first, that the Aryans

' In S. COULING's Encyclopædia Sinica (p. 504) it is stated that in China there is only one crop, but late and early varieties exist.

2 Honzö kömoku keimö, Ch. i8, p. 2.

3 In a subsequent study on the plants and agriculture of the Indo-Chinese, I hope to demonstrate that the Indo-Chinese nations, especially the Chinese and Tibetans, possess a common designation for "hemp," and that hemp has been cultivated by them in a prehistoric age. There also the history of hemp will be discussed.