National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0255 Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2
Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2 / Page 255 (Grayscale High Resolution Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000178
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

 

THE BONES OF THE EXTREMITIES.   419

the first to explain, in a manner as plausible as it was scientific and accurate, the cause of the difference of form of these bones. According to him, the slenderness or thickness of this bone is traceable back to mechanical effects of use, aided naturally by nourishment and climate.* According to the view we have already developed in our special instance of the Anau horse the increasing slenderness of the bones, as the culture-strata grow in height, must be traced back to the increase of desert conditions and the use of the animal for rapid work. It is encouraging and confirmatory of our separate conceptions that our conclusions so agree, although so differently deduced.

On account of the special importance of this bone I repeat here all its dimensions in comparison with a series of other horses of European localities.

Table of dimensions.

This comparative table shows distinctly the relation already noticed in the bones of the other extremities, that the horse of Anau agrees remarkably well with those of the European bronze age and of the later La Tene phase of the iron age. It shows, however, further, that among the horses of Solutré there occur adult

Length.

Greatest.

Width.

Me- Dis-

dian.   tal.

Diameter.

Me- dian.

Ossa metacarpi medii.

Prox-
imal
part.

Prox- imal.

Exte-
rior
side.

Dis- tal.

Index.

mm.

47

44 44 46 46 54

48 5o 6o 52

48

49

49

44

50 5o

49

47

49

50

49

52

48

57

59

MM.

29

31

27

27

29

30

34 399 3 42

40

32

29

35

31

31

36

35

34

30

32

32

30

32

32

41

44

Anau:

—21 ft    228

—15 ft   

+ 8 ft.   

   +33 ft 220

Gross Czernosek (La Tène)    198

Hostomitz (bronze time)    200

   Stankowitz (La Tène) . 216

Couvres (?)     214

Curchy (?)    216

Louverné neolithic (?)     217

Cindré (paleolithic)    219

Fouvent (neolithic)    217

Equus przewalskii Salenski    215

Equus przewalskii juv. Bern, Krae-

mer    204

Solutré, Bern    218

Wohontsch a. Biela (neolithic)..     220

I,eitmeritz, A. (neolithic)    223

Solutré, Bern    220

224

Schlossberg (iron age)    222

Vindonissa:

Amphitheater    226

Amphitheater    227

Castrum    228

Castrum.    230

   Castrum 230

Castrum    23o

Westeregeln, Nehring (diluvial)    235

Rixdorf, Nehring (diluvial)    249

12.8

12.3 13.6 14.5 15 5 8 18.o 17.7 19.2 18.4 14.8

14.2 ,6.o

14.0

13.9

16.3

15.6

15.3

13.2

14.0

14.0

13.4 13.4 13.4 17.4

17.6

mm.

25 2I

22

25

23

27

2I

23

23

22

23

22

mm.

220

192

191

206

206

2II

213

213

210

214

213

218

219

217

220

220

221

225

mm.

42

41

44

40

42

45

46 5o

50

50

50

50

44

48

46

47

4

47

49

43

47

47

48

49

49

555

5

mm.

31

30

30

30

29

35

32

32

37

32

33

31

30

33

32

33

31

31

33

36

33

32

mm.

22

24

2I

28

21

29

27

28

29

27

mm.

32

30

32

28

31

34

34

38

32

28

32

32

36.

33

32

37

33

33

31

35

35

34

35

35

*H. Kraemer, Zur Frage der Knochenstärke der Pferde. Deutsche Landw. Tierzucht, 1904, VIII, Nos. 28 and 31.