National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0049 Ancient Khotan : vol.1
Ancient Khotan : vol.1 / Page 49 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000182
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text


Sec. ill]


The deeply-cut square holes, arranged outside the trefoil niche in the form of a pentagon, undoubtedly served to support a wooden framework which once protected the image.

Colonel Biddulph has already noticed the remains of an ancient irrigation work, which can Ancient

be traced close by, along the right or eastern side of the mouth of Kergah-Nullah. The square water-con-


sockets which are seen there, sunk into the steep rock face at a uniform level and for a con-

siderable distance, were manifestly designed to hold stout pieces of timber, on which a wooden

trough could be fixed to conduct water from the stream of the Nullah for the irrigation of fields

in the main valley. The comparatively high level at which this conduit runs above the rock-

strewn bottom of the Nullah is easily accounted for by its purpose of carrying water to slopes

which could not be reached by irrigation cuts taken from the stream at its actual mouth.

That the construction of this watercourse belongs to an early period, certainly pre-

Muhammadan, is proved beyond doubt by the excellent cutting of the sockets, which shows

a command of stone-craft long lost among the population of these valleys. We may well suppose

that in a period of greater material culture Gilgit was more thickly inhabited than it is now,

and that in consequence portions of ground on the hill sides and on alluvial plateaus more

elevated than any now under cultivation were utilized for fields and required to be irrigated.

Throughout the Gilgit valley it is only the water obtained from the side-streams that renders

agriculture and the growing of fruit trees possible 4.

In connexion with these few notes on ancient remains in Gilgit, I may mention that the Ancient

ruined mounds which Major J. Manners Smith and other officers on duty in Gilgit have noted mGounilgitds in

at Hanzil and Jutial in all probability represent the remains of Stûpas. I was not able to

visit them, but the photograph of the mound near Hanzil (a village about nine miles above

Gilgit Fort) which is reproduced in the report of the Pamir Boundary Commission, distinctly

suggests this origin b. The fact that in either place the ruin shows only rough masonry of

unhewn stone would render it difficult to arrive at any conclusion as to the date of construction

without systematic excavation.

The valley of the Hunza river, through which I passed from Gilgit to the Taghdumbash Valley of

Pamir, is, alike by the stern grandeur of its peaks and glaciers, the natural difficulty of its Hunza.

communications, and the strange mixture of races and languages among its population, a mountain

region of exceptional interest. But the same ice-crowned ranges and almost equally formidable

gorges which have rendered Hunza until our days so secure against foreign invasion, have

also effectively barred the valley from ever serving as a real line of communication or otherwise

acquiring historical importance.

We have striking evidence of this isolation in the survival of Burisheski, the tongue spoken

in Hunza proper, which has no relation whatever to any of the great language families (Indian,

Iranian, Turki, Tibetan) that meet close to this easternmost point of the Hindukush watershed.

Nor can it be doubted that these secluded communities, in their customs, traditions, and economic

conditions, must have preserved much that would prove highly instructive to antiquarian students.

4 See Drew, Jummoo, p. 407 ; compare also the remarks, p. 404, illustrating the reduction of arable land in Astor which has followed long-continued decay of the artificial watercourses.

s See Report of the Pamir Boundary Commission, p. 33. The decidedly circular shape of the mound makes it very improbable that the remains can be those of a `frontier tower of ordinary fashion ', as assumed by one of the members of

that Commission. Such towers are regularly built square throughout the whole of the Dard region. On the other hand, I fail to see how ' the construction of the masonry ' can be adduced as an argument against ` the theory of Buddhist construction ', considering that neither the masonry nor any other details of construction of pre-Muhammadan ruins in the valleys between the Hindukush and Kashmir have as yet been examined by a trained archaeologist.

ll 2