国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0311 Ruins of Desert Cathay : vol.2
中国砂漠地帯の遺跡 : vol.2
Ruins of Desert Cathay : vol.2 / 311 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000213
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

CIi. LXVIII ANCIENT WOVEN FABRICS   209

Another specimen is to be found on a perfectly preserved silk cover, about two feet long, intended for a manuscript roll. Its narrow bands of silk tapestry, extremely fine in texture, show a richly and yet delicately tinted pattern which consists of an adaptation of the palmette and connecting scroll and bears an unmistakably Chinese character. As if this artistic manuscript cover had been specially designed to bring home to us a fascinating problem, we find it decorated also with broad bands of thick silk damask showing a pattern of pronounced ' Sassanian ' type, winged lions facing each other with curled tails. The difference of styles thus brought into closest juxtaposition by the hand which fashioned the cover, is a most suggestive illustration of the widely distant civilizations that once met at Tun-huang.

The question as to the origin of these silk damasks of

' Sassanian ' pattern is as yet difficult to solve. That the designs represented in them are borrowed from Hellenistic art as transplanted to Mesopotamia and thence to Iran,

must be considered certain.   But are we justified in
assuming that the fabrics themselves, showing this close resemblance in style to the ' Coptic ' finds in Egypt, were

manufactured in, and imported from, the Sassanian dominions in Mesopotamia or Persia ? Whatever silk was worked up there and in the Near East, until the first silkworms were introduced into the Byzantine empire about 55o A.D., must have been brought from China itself—or from Khotan. Can we reasonably assume that silk first travelled all the huge distance to Persia from the ' land of the Seres,' always the most important place of its production, in order to be brought back again in the shape of damask to Tun-huang, on the very border of China ? The aggregate journey for caravans would even now amount to at least a year and a half, whereas the distance from the nearest silk-producing provinces of China to Tun-huang could be accomplished easily in less than three months. And the art of silk-weaving must have reached a high standard in China long before Han times, as my finds of fine silk and damask fragments along the Tun-huang Limes conclusively prove.

VOL. II   P