国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
| |||||||||
|
Serindia : vol.2 | |
セリンディア : vol.2 |
•
Sec. iv] FIRST REMAINS OF THE OLD CHINESE LIMES 569
afforded by the sand and gravel which had accumulated along the foot of the wall. Higher up, where this protecting cover was thinning out towards the surface, they had been completely eroded by the wind. The intervening layers of clay and gravel, originally, no doubt, excavated from the adjoining soil, had acquired a remarkable consistency, resembling that of cement and due largely, as subsequent examination showed, to the binding effect of salt. Yet the actual height of the wall, where our experimental digging first uncovered it, was only about five feet. Much of the loose gravel and coarse sand found heaped up along this remnant may have originally been contained in the higher parts of the wall which had completely decayed.
There was little time then available to investigate the constructive details of this strange wall, and still less methodically to search for a clue to its date and origin. But through a lucky chance even this first scraping produced finds of manifest antiquity. Within the bundles of reeds, at the point where the wall had been partially exposed, there turned up fragments of fabrics (T. ni. i. 001, b) in gay-coloured silk and a rag of a stout white fabric in hemp, such as found at the Lou-lan sites remains of iron implements, including what probably were shafts of cross-bow arrows (T. III. i. ooi. a, 002-004) ; the end of a wooden bar (T. ni. i, (Do5) ; a birch of Toghrak twigs, etc. But far more welcome was a small piece of wood, about four inches long and mortised at the back. On the obverse were five Chinese characters, perfectly legible in spite of the faded ink. The inscription, now reproduced in M. Chavannes' Documents under No. 674,6 was quite correctly read on the spot by Chiang Ssû-yeh as simply stating that the object to which the little wooden label had once been attached was ` the clothes bag [of one called] Lu Ting-shih '. The hoped-for chronological clue was not here. Yet, as the writing looked so strikingly old, I ventured, in my Sinologist ignorance, to suggest to Chiang Ssû-yeh that it was of Han times. The conjecture proved right in the end ; but, as told elsewhere, my excellent literatus received it at the time with due critical caution.'
This record and the other small objects had turned up within a few square feet, and clearly proved that the ground along the wall, notwithstanding its desert nature, must have been occupied at some points. But at the time it was difficult to decide how they had got into or underneath the wall just where a fortunate chance had made me first examine it. The most likely explanation seemed to be that the small relics dated from a camp, perhaps of a working party, established here at the first construction of the tower and wall, and that they had been accidentally mixed up with the materials for the latter. This conjecture was confirmed when, on a subsequent visit in 1914, I had the wall cleared at the same spot right down to the ground and found more rags of silk and woollen fabrics, with dung and other refuse, resting on the natural soil beneath.
Of far greater importance to me at the time than such details was the view of the line of wall, as it showed itself above ground stretching away to the east, and of the chain of watch-towers which could be sighted in the distance. Fortune had favoured me in this respect, too, by making me strike just here the fortified border line—for as such I could now safely recognize it. Owing to its commanding position, close to what proved to be a great bend of the line defended by the watchtowers, the post T. in offered itself as a particularly convenient station for a first rapid survey. Only about two miles to the west, on a last offshoot of the same gravel ridge, there rose another tower, T. iv. b. To the south-west, at least two more could be sighted, though at much greater distances. And here I may mention at once as evidence of the care with which commanding positions had been chosen for these watch-stations, and of their distant visibility over such bare
Wall affected by wind-erosion.
First finds at T. tir.
Chinese record on wood.
Occupation of ground proved.
Chain of watchtowers sighted.
6 Cf. Chavannes, Documents, p . 143. The number of the felt on this occasion by my learned Chinese helpmate has
label, T. Ilt. i. 1, having become partially effaced, has been been singled out for special praise by so competent a Sino-
shown there erroneously as T. i. t logist authority as Prof. F. Hirth, when reviewing that work
7 Cf. Desert Cathay, i. p. 542. The critical self-distrust in The Nation (New York), August r5, 1912.
1374 4D
|
Copyright (C) 2003-2019
National Institute of Informatics(国立情報学研究所)
and
The Toyo Bunko(東洋文庫). All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。