National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0141 Notes on Marco Polo : vol.2
Notes on Marco Polo : vol.2 / Page 141 (Grayscale High Resolution Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000246
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

II, 232, 348), and Marignolli's « Gyon », simply reproduce the traditional Γηῶν of the Septuagint.
Although the Jīhūn, the Γηῶν of the Septuagint, one of the four rivers which issued from Paradise,
has been given in the Middle Ages the most fantastic courses, it is certain that Polo uses the name,
in the Mussulman fashion, as the designation of the Oxus, or Amū-daryā (cf. for instance the course
of the Jīhūn in Ya'qūt, trad. BARBIER DE MEYNARD, Dict. Géogr., 183-184). Hethum gives the
Oxus the name of another of the four rivers of Paradise, « Phison ». On the various conceptions
of the Gion and the Phison, see « Quian » and cf. HALLBERG, 222, 387, 405; Y¹, III, 222. Polo
says that the Gion, i. e. the Oxus, falls into the Caspian Sea, and there he is in agreement with
most of the mediaeval maps. I shall not enter here into the examination of the changes in the course
of the Oxus either towards the Aral Sea or towards the Caspian. The last monograph on the subject
is due to BARTHOLD.

243. GIORGE

georgi, jorgius Z giorge, giorgie, ior F jeorge, jorge FA
georgio R giorgio TA¹, TA³ jeorgius L
georgius L, P; G george, jorgan FB jorzo VA
gieorgin, giergin V gorgion LT zorzi VB, VL

It is now a well established fact that Polo's « Giorge » is Prince George of the Öngüt, a Nestorian
tribe then mainly settled outside the north-eastern corner of the great bend of the Yellow River,
and that he was later on converted to Roman Catholicism by Giovanni da Montecorvino. His
Chinese name, K'o-li-chi-ssŭ, represents Syr. Giwargis, « George », transcribed گرگیس Görgüz in
Persian sources (Bl, II, 593, 605, 606, 610; not to be explained here by « blind », as is usually done).
On Prince George, see principally, Y, I, 287-289; TP, 1914, 631-634; and Mo, 234-240. HOWORTH
(I, 556) is absolutely wrong about the identity of Prince George. Useful material is collected in
T'u Chi, 36, 3-4, and 74, 12 b-13 a. Cf. also Monumenta Serica, III, 232-256.

Prince George was killed in 1298 (cf. Oh, II, 513) while fighting against Qaidu and Dua, but
that was long after Polo had left China. No text connects him with Nomoyan (see « Nomogan »),
although he may have been in those parts while still very young. But the memorial devoted to
him and his family by Yen Fu, preserved in Yüan wên lei, ch. 23, suggests another solution. Prince
George's father, Ai-buqa, really took part in Bayan's campaign after Nomoyan had been captured
in 1277; he fought against Sa-li-man (Sarban), one of Nomoyan's captors; we also know that he died
in the field. It is very natural for Polo, so interested in the lineage of Prester John, to have given
more importance than Chinese historians to the participation of Ai-buqa in the Northern wars.
And in his memory, Prince George, the Öngüt prince who lived while he was himself in China,
has taken the place of his father.