National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

of incidents relating to the water and land communications between Yün-nan-fu and Ssŭ-
ch'uan, and always mention the difficulties of the track of land south-west of Hsü-chou, when
passing the territory of the T'u-lao-man. That is one of the reasons why we must admit that the
« Toloman » are the T'u-lao-man, and that « Siugiu » is Hsü-chou of the Mongol period, the
Hsü-chou-fu (vulgo Sui-fu) of modern times. The equivalence of « Siugiu » and Hsü-chou-fu had
already been proposed to YULE, with very good reasons, by RICHTHOFEN, and it is a pity that YULE
did not adopt it outright (Y, II, 129-130). CORDIER's note (Y, II, 131) and the map opposite still
wrongly suppose that Polo's route passed east of Hsü-chou-fu. The result is that the traveller is
supposed to go up to Ch'êng-tu by the To-chiang, while there can be no doubt that his twelve days
of travel by river from « Siugiu » to Ch'êng-tu are from Hsü-chou-fu (Sui-fu) up the Min River via
Chia-ting. RICHTHOFEN was also right on this point.
Although I adopt « Siugiu », « Suigiu » would not be impossible if we could establish that the
Sui- pronunciation of the modern dialectical « Suifu » goes back to the Mongol period.


341. SLIOZOLA (c. 216)

sledis (nominamus 'flamingo' traha LT, P treias L¹
sledem) L⁴ traza VA treies F
slioziole, sliozola (-e) VL treggia (-e) TA¹, TA³ treze VB
traga, tragula P tregia Z troias L
tragia (-e), tregule LT

[The text of the above note is missing due to some mistakes committed by the printer at
London.]


342. SOGATU

sagatu FA, VL; R sogato V sogatu F, FB, LT, P, VA, VB, Z

This is the 唆 都 So-tu of Chinese texts, whose biography is in YS, 129, 5 a-6 a (and in T'u Chi,
80, 1-4), and whose name, in spite of Bl, II, 447, has nothing to do with Sadun. So-tu is *Sŏdü,
for Sŏtü, with the frequent hesitation between t and d in the suffix -tu, -tai, and Sŏdü, Sŏtü is ← Sö'ätü,
written Sögätü. We have here an example of hesitation, among the Mongols themselves, between
the two values -g- and -'- of written -g- (for a similar case with -γ-, see « Tagaciar »). The Chinese
So-tu confirms the « Sogatu » of F and Z against R's « Sagatu », since *Sagatu, *Sa'atu, would
have given *Sätu. The name long remained in use. At the end of the 17th cent., the Manchu