国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0025 Wall Paintings from Ancient Shrines in Central Asia : vol.1
中央アジアの古代寺院の壁画 : vol.1
Wall Paintings from Ancient Shrines in Central Asia : vol.1 / 25 ページ(白黒高解像度画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000259
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

traditions in Art and varying in psychological conceptions. Such fluctuations of
fortune brought the Great Yüeh-chih to drive out the Śakas in 150 B.C., and these
were themselves displaced by the Chinese of the Former Han dynasty, who ruled
for a time, were driven out, but resumed control in the Later Han period after the
victory of the Chinese General Pan Ch'ao over the Khotan ruler in A.D. 70. When
troubles at home, in China, necessitated their withdrawal the Ephthalites or
White Huns came into power, only, in their turn, to be ousted by the Western
Turks. But with the T'ang dynasty, the Chinese, in A.D. 618, again took firm hold.
In A.D. 640 the Chinese army occupied Turfān, and later had the support of the
Uigurs against the Turks. The Tibetans, ever formidable rivals, attacked Khotan
in A.D. 665 and in 670 severely defeated the Chinese and took possession of the
territory, which they held until defeated by the Chinese General Wang Hsiao-
chieh in 692. Later the Arabs became troublesome in the west, and the Tibetans
again in the south. They were, however, checked until a Chinese general treacher-
ously killed the ruler of the tributary kingdom of Tashkend, when the infuriated
son of the murdered man stirred up revolt and attacked the Chinese, inflicting on
them a crushing defeat from which their authority never recovered. Ultimately
the Tibetans gained possession of the whole Tārīm Basin, which they held until
driven out by the Uigurs about the end of the ninth century A.D. About the middle
of the following century Islam is said to have been established throughout Eastern
Turkestān by Satok Boghra Khān.

This very imperfect and summary review is sufficient to indicate some of the
probable reasons for the diversities referred to in design and treatment of the
paintings. Yet, although there are definite differences, there is also repetition of
certain identical mannerisms and even the use of the same compositions in dis-
tricts far apart from one another, suggesting the itinerant nature of the painter's
life, moving along the trade routes, equipped with drawings and tracings of popular
compositions, and exchanging ideas and tracings with brother craftsmen met by
the way.

The occurrence in the late medieval art of Europe of motives and forms found
in Buddhist paintings in Central Asia presents a field of research of considerable
interest, but it lies beyond the scope of the present work.

Of the examples to be here considered the earliest are those from Mīrān
(plates I to III) and the latest, those from Bezeklīk (plates XII to XXXI). The
Mīrān paintings come from the interior walls of the Buddhist shrines M. III and

xix