国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ
|
|
カラー画像サムネイル -
目次 -
ページ番号 -
書誌情報(メタデータ) -
キャプション -
カラー画像 -
白黒高解像度画像 -
見開きページ -
グラフィック -
| 0027 |
Sino-Siberian Art : vol.1 |
| 中国・シベリアの芸術品 : vol.1 |
引用情報
OCR読み取り結果
founded in 436 a Chinese dynasty in the north of the Empire. It appears that
this dynasty kept little of its native art elements (13). This dynasty also had
to defend itself against the hordes we believe to be Mongol, and among whom
the Juan-juan or Avares were the most important.
Finally in the VI century the Turks flowed in a body towards the Chinese
frontier. It is not known when they left their primeval home, but they remem-
bered it as long as they lived in the east. For this reason it was the forests that
seemed to them the most propitious. " Grow strong in the forests of the moun-
tain ", this is what we constantly find on inscriptions discovered in Mongolia (14).
Later Marco Polo relates that all the great Khans and all the descendants of Cingis
were carried into the Altai to be buried (15).
The Empire of the Turks, at first including all the east of the circle of the
Steppes, was already in the VI century divided into eastern and western sections.
The latter region was particularly important for the formation of a mixed Turco-
Chinese art, not only because it bordered China, but above all because it included
ancient Siberian centres of metal production around the Jenissei, Lake Baikal,
and the Selenga. Several of these centres, especially in the vicinity of Minnus-
sinsk were at that time in the hands of the Kirgises, who, however, were entirely
assimilated by the Turks. Since they were the link between southern Siberia
and northern China, the eastern Turks may be considered as the creators of many
of the works of art reproduced here. They had not only been recognised in
Chinese texts ever since the VI century, but they themselves left authentic
documents. The Turkish inscriptions from the Jenissei, although by the Kir-
gises, belong to the VII century (16). The monuments of the river Orkhon
date from the years 731 and 733 (17). At this period the empire of the eastern
Turks was already dependent on China and in 741 was destroyed by another
Turkish tribe, the Uigurs (18), who for a long time had inhabited Turkestan,
that is, to the south of the circle of the Steppes. There they most certainly
attained a much higher culture than that of their northern kin. It is probably
because of this that Chavannes wrote that the gold plaques (which, however,
belong for the most part half a century earlier), were the work of the
Uigurs (19).
In 840 the Kirgises took the place of the Turks as neighbours of the Chinese
(20). In the X century began the success of the K'itan, a Mongol tribe (21),
who for a certain time managed to secure the northern section of China.
A Tangut tribe, the Si-hia, founded a barbarian state in the province of
Shen-si in 1032 (22). We shall speak later on of their writing which allows us a
possibility of dating their monuments. Towards 1120, the K'itan gave way to
the Tungus, the Ju-chen (23), who, coming from the northwest, probably
brought with them but little civilization and but few artistic forms. Finally
in the XII century came the advance of the Mongols. In the second half of
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
11
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
21
.
.
.
25
26
27
28
29
.
31
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
41
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
51
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
61
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
71
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
81
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
91
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
101
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
111
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
121
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
131
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
147
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
167
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
187
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
207
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
226
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics(国立情報学研究所)
and
The Toyo Bunko(東洋文庫). All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。