国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ
|
|
カラー画像サムネイル -
目次 -
ページ番号 -
書誌情報（メタデータ） -
キャプション -
カラー画像 -
白黒高解像度画像 -
見開きページ -
グラフィック -
| 0181 |
Southern Tibet : vol.1 |
| 南チベット : vol.1 |
引用情報
OCR読み取り結果
*Chu-ka-la-ho* coming from N.E. [The Chu-ka-la-ho comes out from the southern foot of Ts'ang-wên-ling, and first flows southwards, then south-westwards, and passing to the S.E. of *Ku-ko-cha-shi-lu-mu-po-tse-ching*, turns south-westwards and joins the Lang-chu-ho. The length of this stream is more than 200 li.]²
This description is, according to Professor Ogawa, published in the 26th year of CHIEN LUNG's reign. When reading it again and again I cannot help getting the impression that it dates from the same documents and sketches which were delivered to the Jesuit Fathers and by them sent to d'Anville. For the description is in perfect harmony with d'Anville's maps in du Halde and even the same names are to be found in both cases and written very much like each other, disregarding the French transcription of the Chinese syllables. And as the Shui-tao-ti-kang is only a compilation its author had to use any reliable material he could get hold of. From wherever it comes, this description is admirable and distinguished by the same careful conformity with the truth and conscientiousness as all other Chinese geographical descriptions.¹
The case is the same so far as the Shui-tao-ti-kang is concerned. A description in a few words of the Kang-ti-ssŭ (d'Anville has Kentaisse) could not possibly be more graphic and correct. The same mistake about the Ganges as on the Lama map is made here, when the author thinks the Kang-ka-chiang or Ganges is a continuation of the river which »comes out from» the Kailas, and which, on d'Anville's map is called Latchou R., or one of the feeders of Gar-chu, the S.W. branch of the Indus. In a preceding chapter I have tried to explain why the Lamas confounded the Indus and the Satlej with the Ganges, which gives an example of a geographical object they had not seen with their own eyes, and in which they therefore were mistaken.
The most interesting passage is, however, the one about the »high mountain» Langchen-kabab, which, quite correctly, is said to be S.E. of the Kailas and east of Taklakhar. It resembles an elephant, a quality which is now transferred to a little hill on the bank of the Satlej at Dölchu-gompa, west of Langak-tso. Then follows a description of the uppermost Satlej on its way from the northern foot of Langchen-kabab towards the N.W. When the author says that this river, which is
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
17
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
29
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
39
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
50
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
60
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
70
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
81
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
93
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
103
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
113
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
124
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
137
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
148
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
159
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
169
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
179
180
181
182
183
.
|
.
.
.
.
190
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
201
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
212
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
222
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
233
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
246
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
261
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
277
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
293
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
306
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
319
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
331
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
345
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
358
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
370
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
381
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
394
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
405
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
415
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
425
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
436
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
454
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics（国立情報学研究所）
and
The Toyo Bunko（東洋文庫）. All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。
