国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0337 Southern Tibet : vol.2
南チベット : vol.2
Southern Tibet : vol.2 / 337 ページ(白黒高解像度画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000263
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

the text. But both disagree with the reality. For, provided the Dak Eo is situated
only some 14 miles E.S.E. of Gurla's highest summit, as on Webber's map, they
could not possibly have reached the upper feeders of the Brahmaputra without having
crossed at least the Tage-tsangpo, or the glacier brook from Ganglung-gangri. Such
a fact might have been omitted in the text, but why should it be omitted on the
map, where their route from the Dak Eo goes directly down to the sources of the
Brahmaputra?

However, they are now somewhere in the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra.
There were no inhabitants, the valleys were desolate, »there was ridge succeeding
ridge, and sloping valleys intervening, all so like one another that it was hard to
distinguish one's locality. The compass had often to be consulted if the great sum-
mit of Gurla Mandhata was lost to view, and our shikaris were often in doubt as
to our direction . . .» Near the source of the river the Gurla cannot be seen at all!

Webber has another surprising piece of news in store for his readers. For »at
one occasion« he and his party »suddenly« found themselves on the watershed of the
Indus! ¹ Far beneath them and only some miles away was the Manasarovar. Towering
above all the mountains they saw the sacred Kailas. They sat down for a while to
enjoy »the wonderful and extensive panorama, and sketched it in water colours as a
record of our tramp«.

In connection with the source of the Satlej and the Indus I have tried to solve
this problem. Wherever you choose to place the source of the Brahmaputra, — and
there have indeed been many proposals in that way — the Kailas cannot be seen from
anyone of them, at any rate not from anyone of the sources of the southern branches.
I do not know whether it can be seen from the Maryum-la. But the Manasarovar cannot
be seen from the Maryum-la. RYDER and RAWLING crossed the Maryum-la on Novem-
ber 26th and: »came in sight of the Manasarowar lake on November 30«. ² From
the neighbourhood of none of the southern sources can the lake be seen. It is in-
visible from the whole region of the uppermost Tsangpo. And still Webber saw
it beneath him and only some miles away. And as a record of his tramp he
sketched the whole panorama with the lake, the Kailas and all. Moreover, between
the shore of the Manasarovar and his own standing point »the foreground was flat,
rolling hills and ridges sloping gradually towards the lake . . .» Such a description
of the foreground, and S.E. of the lake is correct, but only at a distance of »some
miles« from the lake.

»Next day (after having sketched the Manasarovar etc.) we marched a long
way eastward along the northern slopes of the Gurla range, following the valley of
the Brahmaputra.« ³ They marched along the Gurla range and in the valley of the
Brahmaputra at the same time! From any point from which the Manasarovar and