National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0064 Southern Tibet : vol.2
Southern Tibet : vol.2 / Page 64 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000263
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

this he is wrong, as the Tirtapuri river comes from the Rakas-tal, and the other is
the Gyanima river. Here his map is also wrong.

His way now goes over Kien-lung, Dúmpú and Daba. Once he heard of the
riding post from Gartok to Lhasa or »Ouchong», a distance which he calculates at
880 miles. But we leave his further adventures and narrow escapes on the way back
over the Niti pass to India.

His map, Pl. III, forms a highly interesting document, and was, for its time,
a great addition to geography. The two lakes are marked between the very regular
ranges of Himáchal Mts. and Cailás Mts. running N.W. to S.E.

Mt. Cailása is placed on the map on the range Cailás Mts. After Desideri,
Moorcroft was the first European who saw this part of the Transhimalaya.

»Lake Mápáng or Mánas-sarówar» is not far from correct, whereas Ráwan-
hrad is very bad. Only its N.E. corner, where his route was nearest, is good. His
greatest mistake is to represent the Tirtapuri river as beginning from the plains
south of the Kailas Mts., instead of from Rakas-tal and to represent the Gyanima
tributary which joins a little below Tirtapuri as being the branch coming from the
lake. In 1812 no water could possibly issue from the Rakas-tal, as there was not even
a channel between the two lakes. Even when this channel, nowadays occasionally
carries water, there is, as a rule, no efflux through the old Satlej-bed. As the natives
obviously have told Moorcroft there was really a river going out of the Rakas-tal,
this lets us suspect that there was an efflux in 1796 and 1804 and that the natives
reported their experiences from then.

RITTER discusses in his usual able and thorough way the results of Moor-
croft's journey.¹ From the knowledge of his time Ritter could not know, that
all these pretended discoveries were imaginary. For, as we have seen, Moorcroft
was not even the first European at the lakes, which had also been so well mapped
already a hundred years before his time. And he never visited those parts of the
country where the sources of the Satlej and the Indus are situated. But Ritter is
right in calling him an audacious and excellent observer, whose journey cleared up
many dark points in western Tibet and also regarding the communication between
this country and Turkestan. In the discussion he again says that through him the
upper and real courses of the Satlej and the Indus were discovered and that he
was the first European who visited and discovered the sacred lakes».

On his road from Gertope to the Manasarovar he passed the sources of the
Indus, says Ritter. He also saw and crossed the table-land that is the water-parting
between the Indus and the Satlej.²