国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0362 Southern Tibet : vol.2
南チベット : vol.2
Southern Tibet : vol.2 / 362 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000263
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

sources of Indus and Brahmaputra» as »mystic», although I had described both
in 1909.
In 1907 the last word had not been said in this question. Lord CURZON has
expressed the situation thus: »When a traveller pursues earlier investigations a few
stages further, on lines already followed and accepted but not carried to their logical
or geographical conclusion, he determines.»³ This view is correct — if Chinese
sources are considered. All other material was insufficient. Both Nain Sing and
Ryder confounded the Chema-yundung and the Kubi-tsangpo. Kawaguchi is the only
modern traveller who mentions both rivers, even by their correct names, although
his results were not yet published or known when I published mine. But even
Kawaguchi says: »the sources of the Tamchok Khanbab have hitherto defied in-
vestigations.