国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0243 Southern Tibet : vol.3
南チベット : vol.3
Southern Tibet : vol.3 / 243 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000263
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

the Southern range if compared with Arka-tagh and the principal or northern Kara-
korum system. The Northern Range, however, is composed of the Kara-korum and
the Gang-dis-ri. Markham thus regards the Gang-dis-ri, Hodgson's Nyenchhen-thánglá,
as a direct continuation of the Kara-korum, a view which originated from Hodgson
and had no ground whatever in facts. If such a question as this: is the Trans-
himalayan system a direct continuation of the Kara-korum or not? should be put to
all living geographers, not one of them would even now be able to answer. In
1877 it was easier, for then mere theories were used as proofs, and as next to
nothing was really known, except the sporadic discoveries of the Pundits, one had
a feeling of liberty to arrange the great features of orography in the way that
seemed to everybody to be the most likely.
Markham also states as a positive fact that the sources of the Indus, Satlej
and Brahmaputra are situated on the southern slopes of the Northern Range. The
real sources of the Satlej and Brahmaputra are, as we have seen, situated on the
northern slopes of the Himalaya, although many sources of northern tributaries come
from the southern slopes of the Transhimalaya. The sources of the Indus are situated
between different ranges belonging to the Transhimalaya. This conclusion could have
been drawn even from the material existing in 1877, as ten years earlier some of
the more or less parallel ranges had been crossed by Pundits. But Markham re-
garded the Transhimalayan system as one definite range, and as its water-parting
followed its crest the Indus could not possibly originate from its northern side. The
possibility of several ranges, some of which could be pierced by the river, was
forgotten.
We cannot leave Markham without noting the Calcutta Reviewer's opinion
regarding the three ranges. He suggests the phrase »Indo-Tibetan system» for the
mountainous tract which Markham designates Himalayan and as inner and outer are
words which are likely to lead to confusion, he recommends that they be abandoned
altogether. If there were three chains, the appropriate terms for them would clearly
be Northern, Southern and Central. He continues: »We had thought that this theory
of three chains had long ago been exploded by Mr. Brian Hodgson and other great
authorities who have the advantage over Mr. Markham of having studied the ques-
tion on the spot, and who maintain that the so-called southern chain, being occa-
sionally intersected by rivers of more remote origin, is not a chain at all, but a
series of spurs running south-wards from an extended line of elevation more to the
north . . . . — The line of the main watershed on the north, the general direction
of which agrees with Mr. Markham's northern chain of Kara-korum and Nyenchen-
thangla mountains, may be traced by the following passes, uplands, &c., from the
north-west corner of the Tagdumbash Pamir:» — amongst the passes which he
enumerates are: Mintaka, Kalik, Mustagh, Karakorum, Dapsang, Changlungbarma.
Chumik, Lakmo, Chomorong, and Khalamba-la.¹