国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ
|
|
カラー画像サムネイル -
目次 -
ページ番号 -
書誌情報（メタデータ） -
キャプション -
カラー画像 -
白黒高解像度画像 -
見開きページ -
グラフィック -
| 0059 |
Southern Tibet : vol.7 |
| 南チベット : vol.7 |
引用情報
OCR読み取り結果
enumerates the different classical authors who have used this name, and he gives
the different spellings in which it appears. He also tries, as far as possible, to
explain the chief orographical feature of each system, and the part it plays as
a water-parting or source of great rivers. So he says:
Ex hoc Paropamiso, Indus fluvius fontes ducit, vt Plinius cum Arriano perhibet.
quo tractu hodie à Pineto & Ger. Mercatore Pamer vocatur. Atque haec est altissima
pars Orbis terrae M. Paulo Veneto teste. Naugracot in Asiae tabulis idem locus nominatur.
In Paropamiso monte Arca Noë constitit, opinione Becani, lege eius Indoscythica. —
On Mercator's Map of the World, 1569, MARCO POLO is indeed mentioned
as a witness of the legend: Pamer altissima pars totius continentis.
Under the name Tavrvs, Ortelius again collects all the different versions of
appellations he has been able to find out. The Caucasus he places thus: Cavcasii
montes, qui propriè sic dicuntur, sunt Ptolemaeo circa Oxi & Indi fluminis fontes.
As to the Imaus, he tries to place some recent names belonging to that system,
amongst others M. Dalangver and M. Naugracot.
Imaus, Straboni pars Tauri Montis, ad Mare Eoum, contestantibus Plinio & Orosio.
Emaon, ἡμαχν, Arriano dicitur, in Indicis: sed idem paulò infra habet quoque ὑμαχν.
Semanthini Montes Ptolemaeo sunt. Ger. Mercator Inifa interpretatur cuius Paulus Venetus
meminit, argentique fodinas in eo esse scribit. Jac. Castaldus Altaï putat, vbi omnes Tar-
tariae Impp. sepeliuntur. Bapt. Ramusius hunc Altaï eundem esse putat cum Belgian
monte, in quo Haythonus Tartaros habitasse ait. Hic Imaus mons, videtur Postello Sephar,
cuius in Sacris litteris memoria est. Imaus Ptolemaei ab hoc Imao longè alius, nempe qui
ex radicibus Tauri exoriens, & vsque ad Mare Glaciale progrediens, Scythiam (quae ab eo
Intra & Extra Imaum cognominatur) bifariam diuidit, hunc ab accolis Dalanguer & Nau-
gracot appellari tradit Castaldus. Huius Imau promontorio (si in remotissimis mihi quoque
diuinare lubeat) videntur Altaï & Belgian recentia nomina quadrare. Imavm Montem
aestimat Montanus in suo Apparatu Biblico Abimael Hebraeis nuncupari. Theuetus Imaum
Copizath ab Indis nominari dicit.
In the first 50 or 60 years after Ortelius, both classical and recent names
appeared on the maps. SANSON D'ABBEVILLE, 1654, has Mont de Caucase and
Dalanguer Mont. KIRCHER, 1667, has Caucasus mons, Montes Tebetici and Belor
Mons. On VISSCHER'S map of 1680 we find Naugracut together with Kircher's
Montes Tebetici and a new appellation: Serenager Montes. On DELISLE'S map of
1705, Naugracut seems to begin to be antiquated, and Himalaya is now called
M. de Purbet ou de Naugracut. A year later Delisle introduces the name M.
Hendoukech on his maps. In 1723 the same draftsman has Mont Ima Montagne
de Negracut for Himalaya and Mont Tangri ou Tangour (Langur?) for its eastern
part. He also knows Mont Tanla ou Otunlao. STRAHLENBERG, 1730, has M.
Hendukesh and Mus Tagk alias Imaus Mons, though he is not the first to introduce
these names. On D'ANVILLE'S map of 1733 we read in the Himalaya region, so
far as it is embraced by such names as Rimola MM. Tchomla MM.
Oumoula MM., which have a certain resemblence to »Himala». On RENNELL'S map
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
17
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
28
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
38
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
49
.
.
.
.
|
.
57
58
59
60
61
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
70
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
81
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
92
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
105
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
117
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
128
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
138
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
150
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
161
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
177
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
190
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
202
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
214
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
225
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
237
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
251
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
263
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
277
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
291
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
302
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
315
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
329
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
342
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
352
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
363
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
375
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
386
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
397
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
407
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
420
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
432
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
444
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
457
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
467
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
478
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
488
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
499
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
510
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
520
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
530
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
541
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
552
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
563
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
573
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
583
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
593
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
605
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
615
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
625
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
635
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
646
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
656
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
666
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
681
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
693
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
704
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
714
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
726
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
737
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
747
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
758
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
773
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
788
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
801
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
813
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
833
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
848
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
864
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
876
.
.
.
.
|
888
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics（国立情報学研究所）
and
The Toyo Bunko（東洋文庫）. All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。
