国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0487 Southern Tibet : vol.7
南チベット : vol.7
Southern Tibet : vol.7 / 487 ページ(白黒高解像度画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000263
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

it, Klaproth provided only the stones, with which HUMBOLDT tried to construct the
architecture of Asia. Klaproth's map (Paris 1836) was, however, a masterpiece and
the first to bring light into the geography of Central Asia. Humboldt's geometrical
construction proved to be false in many places, and right in others, but it worked
in a high degree as an impetus to new researches.

Of the hypothetical prolongations of Humboldt's four ranges, only the Kwen-
lun Range and its continuation into China was, as Richthofen remarks, a happy idea.
All the others have proved to be »artificial constructions». Bolor-tagh has only a
conditional existence.

Nur allmählig ist eine verbesserte Gebirgskunde an die Stelle des geistvollen Schemas
getreten, und noch sind wir erst bei den Anfängen derselben. Vorsichtig können wir
Einzelnes construiren. Die Gesammtkenntiss ist noch in grosser Ferne. In vielen Fällen
aber verleitet das Streben nach einer klaren Anschauung auch jetzt zur hypothetischen
Ergänzung desjenigen was festgelegt ist.

This was said 40 years ago and has so far proved to be right. It is true
that since Richthofen wrote we have approached the final understanding considerably,
but in some regions, as in the mountains around the Indo-Chinese rivers and in the
interior of Tibet, we are only at the beginning. So far as my own Transhimalayan
region is concerned, only the first step of the pioneer has been taken. Therefore,
Richthofen showed how erroneous many hypothetical ranges must have been in
1877, especially in regions which were not yet open to exploration. Our maps of
China used to represent mountain ranges wherever water-partings were situated.

In the seventh chapter¹ of his work, Richthofen has collected all known facts
about the orography and geology of, and exploration in, the Kwen-lun »and the
mountainous country south of it».² We miss only the names of HODGSON and
SAUNDERS, for in their theories Richthofen seems to have had no confidence at all.

He regards the Kwen-lun as the back-bone of eastern Asia. It stretches east-
wards and its prolongation divides China Proper into two halves very unlike each other.
In the heart of Asia it also plays the part of a great dividing wall. He gives it a
length of 42 degrees. Already at the end of the silurian age it rose as a considerable
system. Richthofen found in its eastern portions that it never since the silurian age
had been covered by water, even if it had undergone several other changes. STO-
LICZKA proved that the conditions were the same in the west, pointing to the great
homogenity of the whole system. For a considerable length in China, it is the water-
parting between the Hwang-ho and Yang-tse. As to the Tibetan portion of the
Kwen-lun, Richthofen's knowledge was, of course, insufficient; he did not and could