National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0055 Archaeological Researches in Sinkiang : vol.1
Archaeological Researches in Sinkiang : vol.1 / Page 55 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000195
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

when the river course changes. The lake together with the lower part of the Tarim
has therefore been compared with a pendulum.

We cannot follow all the minor changes in the river course, as there does not exist
any map covering the whole region of the lower Tarim. Such a map can only be
made from the air. It has been possible, however, to determine the major changes
of the main water courses, especially thanks to Dr. Hedin's untiring efforts.

The southernmost position, which the terminal lake of Tarim can occupy coincides
with Qara-qoshun, and the northernmost position must nearly coincide with the
present new lake Lop-nor. Between these southern and northern limits Lop-nor
alternates. There have possibly existed intermediary stages, but we have no definite
facts about them. Cf. the map Fig. 36.

It is hardly necessary to relate here how these river displacements were investig-
ated, as a special volume of the Report series will treat the Lop-nor and the lower
Tarim region. I will only summarize some main points bearing on the subject of
archaeology and draw some conclusions.

During the latter part of the second century B. C. the main part of the joined
waters of the Tarim and the Könche-darya had an easterly course, probably along
what is now Qum-darya. The water apparently continued to flow thus until about
330 A. D. The latest dated document from Lou-lan bears the year 330 A. D., and it
seems to mark the end of the Lou-lan occupation. It is very likely that the aban-
doning of Lou-lan was caused by a decreasing water supply in the Tarim of that
region, i. e. the river had taken another course around that time. If this supposition
is correct, we have here the first known displacement of the river.

Our knowledge of how the river behaved from the fourth to the nineteenth centu-
ries is very limited. In historical records there is nowhere any mention of a revived
Lou-lan. Certain observations made by Stein, Hörner and myself indicate that the
Quruq-darya bed carried water for at least one shorter period in relatively modern
times (Stein 1921, pp. 359 sq and 386, 1928, p. 286; Hörner 1935 p. 152). Possibly
that river course was also active some time between 600 and 1000, as indicated by
the occurrence of some graves.¹ Hedin noticed living poplars in two places and living
tamarisks in one place near the then dry bed of Quruq-darya to the east of Yar-
dang-bulaq (Hedin 1905, pp. 59, 61, 63). Subsoil drainage from Quruq-tagh may
partly account for these phenomena, but it is also likely that a temporary wet period
of Quruq-darya was the single cause of these signs of vegetable life.

In 1877 Prjevalsky discovered the Qara-qoshun lake in the southern part of the
Lop-nor depression, a lake formed by the Tarim and the Könche-darya; during high
water periods Charchan-darya was also a tributary to this lake. Until lately Qara-
qoshun has played the rôle of ancient Lop-nor on the maps.

Richthofen objected to the identification of Qara-qoshun with the ancient lake