National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

If we may apply here the law which I have stated as controlling the growth
of primitive cities built of air-dried bricks in dry climates, the thickness of the
culture-strata exposed by De Morgan's excavations would give an interval of
about 1,000 years (at the rate of 2 feet per century) between the end of the stone
age and the end of the "archaic" period. Since the stone age and transition
strata occur up to 60 feet above the plain, and remains of occupation extend
several meters below the level of the plain, it is not improbable that there are not
less than 2,000 or 3,000 years of prearchaic culture represented here.

Thus the exposed earliest civilizations of Anau and Susiana, separated by
the broad expanse of the Iranian plateau, had several most fundamental traits
in common, although the possession of the potters' wheel at Susa and a wider
range of motives of decoration of pottery point to a civilization probably more
advanced in development and of later date than that of Anau II. In both regions
the people were settled in towns built of air-dried bricks; both peoples had agri-
culture, both peoples used the pivotal door-stone, and both had well-developed
potters' arts and painted ornamentation. And in both places excavations, while
showing extensive use of flint for sickles and other domestic purposes, have failed
to bring to light any traces of its use, in the earliest cultures, for arrows and lances
or celts. We may therefore consider both of these earliest civilizations to have
been native to Asia. The total absence of stone arrow-points and stone lance-
points in the earliest cultures in Susiana corroborates the inference drawn from
their absence in early Anau, that these civilizations were evolved during a period
of isolation at least from Africa and Europe, dating from preglacial or early inter-
glacial time. I have, in chapters I and IV, traced the cause of this isolation to the
influence of the glacial period, and have given reasons for including within its
sphere the whole region between the Caspian Sea and Mesopotamia on the west,
and the Hindu-Kush and Tian Shan mountains on the east, with an additional
but detached and perhaps independently isolated area to the east of these moun-
tain barriers, including the whole of the Gobi region.

It would seem, then, that the widely separated civilizations of Anau and
Susiana must have been genetically related, and that the region of isolation must
have included not only Transcaspia but also Susiana, at least down to the time
when the earliest culture of Susa, using sickle-flints and the contemporary variety
of painted pottery, ceased to exist. A genetic relationship between these two
civilizations presupposes a region in which they were in intimate contact, living
in an agricultural stage of culture on oases somewhere, either on the Iranian
plateau or on the lower lands along its northern edge.

We have at present no data for closely defining the region where this next-
underlying stage of culture existed. It could not have been on the Babylonian
plain, for as Professor Sayce remarks, this was in its natural condition a pesti-
ferous marsh, which could be conquered for agriculture "only by a people armed
with a civilization which enabled them to dig canals, to mold bricks, and pile their
houses and temples on artificial foundations."* This is due to the long-continued
annual inundation of the plain common to the two great rivers, the flood of one