National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books
|
|
Color Thumbnail -
Table of Contents -
Page Number -
Biliographic Information (Metadata) -
Caption -
Color Image -
Gray HighRes. Image -
Facing Pages -
Graphics -
| 0089 |
Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2 |
Citation Information
OCR Text
It may, therefore, be said that the kurgan remains of most favored oases,
those where water was easily led and found its way in flood, have been eroded and
buried, wholly obliterated unless they were occupied over 0.57 of the time since
their foundation. Or, any such city, founded 5,000 years ago and not occupied
at least 3,000 years, has vanished. Such must have been the fate of those where
the plains are always aggrading; but along the borders in the region of uptilting
piedmonts, where oases of type I b and type IV abound, aggradation was apparently
so counteracted by crustal movement that during dry periods some areas rose
above it altogether. It is to that process we owe the preservation above ground
of both kurgans at Anau. The piedmont on which they rest appears to have been
uplifted so nearly as fast as the plain aggraded that during all of 10,000 years no
more than 20 feet of sediments has risen around the North Kurgan, though during
that time it seems likely that about 80 feet have been deposited farther out in the
desert. As a check upon the logic of our equations, it is interesting to solve for
occupation on the North Kurgan. Knowing the total remnant thickness of culture,
60 feet, and assuming Professor Pumpelly's estimate of time since foundation, 100
centuries, we have: taking the remnant height, h=lG−E (t−l), 64=l×2−0.8
(100−l) or 2.8 l=144 and l=51.5 centuries. Then its original thickness, lG,
would have been 2×51.5=103 feet, of which it has lost by erosion 43 feet. This,
taken in view of the deformation testified by its profile, the upper part having
withered to a rounded form leaving a base under ground of twice the diameter of
that above ground, seems a conservative estimate. There is, however, no reason
to suppose that it had ever attained a thickness of 103 feet at any one time. This
accumulation may have resulted during several periods of occupation, between
which it was abandoned to erosion. That part of its growth was during reoccupa-
tion of comparatively recent times is evidenced by quantities of late pottery and
débris, deep-buried in the wash under its surrounding plain, having drifted down
there from above, though now absent on top.
An examination of the surface and gully-sections of 20 or 30 kurgans on the
zone of constant aggradation, revealed no indication of anything over 1,000 to 3,000
years old, and such was Mr. Huntington's experience in his study of 20 or more
kurgans north of Merv. To one having a general idea about rates of erosion and
aggradation in this region, it is no surprise that nearly all the kurgans of Central
Asia seem to belong in the last 2,000 or 3,000 years. There can be very few as old
as the North Kurgan at Anau still above ground.
But the very fact that Central Asia has been progressively drying up has
helped prevent a universal burial of oases of type I a, those on far-out deltas,
because streams and their canals contracted, leaving their oases beyond both water
supply and sedimentation. Many kurgans, then, still rise above the desert for the
very reason for which they were abandoned. Another set-back against burial
has been warping. The region of Samarkand has been warped into a low dome
about 40 miles across, through which the Zerafshan distributaries—many of them
artificial—have cut their channels to a depth of 50 to 100 feet in the highest or
middle part, some of them reuniting beyond. Now, it is only with canals many
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
11
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
22
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
32
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
42
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
52
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
63
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
73
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
84
.
.
87
88
89
90
91
.
.
94
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
105
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
119
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
130
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
141
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
153
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
163
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
175
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
187
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
199
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
211
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
225
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
237
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
250
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
262
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
272
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
282
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
294
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
304
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
317
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
328
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
338
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
348
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
358
.
.
.
.
|
364
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics
and
The Toyo Bunko. All Rights Reserved.