National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0201 Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2
Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2 / Page 201 (Grayscale High Resolution Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000178
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

of the heavy draft-horse of Europe; and now Kraemer* comes to the conclusion
that the horses of classical Rome and Greece represent a cross between the heavy
European horse and the Asiatic type. Notwithstanding the very plausible fact
of the domestication of the European wild horse, however, it can not be contra-
dicted that this wild horse itself could have come from Asia.

In considering the horse of the Anau kurgan, it is primarily worthy of note
(1) That the horse from the lowest to the uppermost layers is represented by a
great quantity of bones, to an extent which in the lower layers is only equaled
by those of the bovid; (2) that in these bones we can recognize only one variety
of horse, which thus occurs in the lowest layers with wild animals only and in
the higher strata with the other domesticated animals; (3) that the percentage
of the bones of the horse, as compared with those of other domesticated animals,
also increases in period Ib. This last fact permits the conclusion that the horse
came to the table of the inhabitants more often in the later than in the earliest
period of the development of the kurgan civilization, from which we might next
conclude that the horse was then easier to catch and had, therefore, become tamed
or domesticated.

It is not possible to assert with logical certainty the correctness of our con-
clusion that we have here, at least in the upper strata, a domesticated horse,
as we were able to do in the cases of the bovid and sheep through a study of the
skeletal remains. I hold that no one is able to determine with certainty, from
the study of a few bones of a fossil or a subfossil horse, whether the individual
was wild or domesticated.

There are wanting in the case of the horse precisely the criteria which we
have in the bovids, where in consequence of stabling or of restriction of freedom
of movement, the substantia compacta of the bones is thrown into the background
in favor of the spongiosa. Again, we are not able to base a distinction between
the domesticated and the wild animal on a change in the skull, as we do in the
sheep. On the contrary, the mode of life of the horse, especially among inhabi-
tants of the steppes, remains the same as in the wild condition. Harnessing,
and the use of the organs as in the wild condition, insures the stability of the
bodily form and of the skeleton; and the influence of the weight of the rider carried
by the animal is not further perceptible in the bones. Consequently, in the horse
of a primitive people, such as were the inhabitants of the Anau kurgan in the
neolithic age, the quality of tameness is wholly psychological and is therefore
not perceptible in an anatomical investigation.

The determinable remains of the horse from the kurgan number about 1,250.
There are, however, but 120 well-preserved pieces, which repay an exact measure-
ment and study. Beginning with the examination of the cranial remains, we
find the best among them to be a right upper-jaw with the whole dental row and
half of the bone palate. A comparison of the measurements of these pieces with
other horse skulls shows a good agreement with a subfossil skull from Western