National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

loop is often greater than the forward one. The external channel is much less
deep in the ass than in the horse.

To discriminate among whole skulls, Lesbre finds by comparison, empirically,
the method of drawing a connecting line between the tuber molaris and the fossa
articularis ossis zygomatici; if the prolongation of this line strikes the crista occipitalis, or anterior to this cuts the facial plane, the animal is an ass; if this line passes
posterior to the crista occipitalis it is a horse.

Tscherski* places much dependence on the construction of the nasal bones
and on the form of the suture between the lacrimal and the nasal bone. This,
he says, is in the ass always curved outward in bow shape, but is straight in the
horse. I find that this relation is very dependent on the breadth of the forehead.
The foramina infra-orbitalia stand nearer (to the naso-maxillar suture) in the ass
than in the horse. He says, further, that in the horse the processus zygomatici
ossis frontalis is three-cornered, but in the ass oval and compressed.

Salenski† asserts that Tscherski's criteria are valuable and to the point,
especially the form of the suture between the lacrimal and the nasal bone, but that
a difference in the cross-section of the processus zygomatici ossis frontalis can not
be verified in the ass and horse. On the other hand, Salenski proposes another
method, which he considers extremely constant: the lower edge of the lower
jaw is in the ass curved and furnished with protuberances, while in the horse
it is smooth and straight. Unfortunately I can not agree with Salenski, as I
consider this criterion of the lower jaw very variable, eminently dependent on the
age of the individual; one has only to compare the lower jaw-bone of the horse
of Auvernier with the one of exactly similar shape in the ass from Abadieh (plate
87, figs. 1 and 2).

So far the authors. It is now time to investigate the conditioning factors
that influence the shaping of the skull of the ass and of the horse. Starting with
the law, which I have proved elsewhere,‡ that the skull is a flexible product
of the influence of skin and muscle, the longer ear and its generally different
position seems to be decisive for the head of the ass. The greater burden imposed
by the external ear must have had as a consequence a change in the musculature
of the ear, which in turn, as is shown by Anthony§ and Toldt‖ exerts its influence
on the bones. Indeed the whole ear-musculature is different in the ass, as I was
able to observe in agreement with Kirsten,¶ on the only fresh head that I could
obtain.