国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ
|
|
カラー画像サムネイル -
目次 -
ページ番号 -
書誌情報(メタデータ) -
キャプション -
カラー画像 -
白黒高解像度画像 -
見開きページ -
グラフィック -
| 0596 |
Serindia : vol.1 |
| セリンディア : vol.1 |
引用情報
OCR読み取り結果
now almost effaced, and washes of pale grey added for the shading of one side of the nose and
neck, the hollow of the eye, and the under-lip. The outlines of the face and features were then
freely drawn in with the brush in a reddish brown of varying tints. This red-brown was used also
for the line dividing the lips, which is curved in most of the figures, but straight in viii and ix. The
lips themselves were painted in subsequently in bright red, 'high lights' being cleverly left in the
underlying buff or boldly applied in white. Finally, black was used to paint in the hair as well as
the outlines of the wings, shoulders, and robes ; also to emphasize, over the brown contour lines,
the eyebrows, the eyelashes, the nostrils, the corners of mouth, the hollow and base of the chin.
Black served further to define the pupil of the eye and the outline of the iris. The iris itself was
painted in the nut-brown of the flesh outlines and made vertically elliptical, instead of circular, to
express the foreshortening of the iris as turned aside. For the eyeballs white was added thickly,
sometimes in regular impasto, over grey. The painting throughout is rapid and bold, but
Mr. Andrews rightly calls attention to distinctions in individual figures, such as the spirited work
in i, ii, and ix, and the firmness and precision shown by viii, while signs of haste and carelessness
are apparent in v.
Difference But by the side of distinctions of this kind, resulting from quasi-unconscious change in the
in pose and
expression. personal factor, it is easy to note far more marked differences in the pose and expression of the
figures, which manifestly proceed from a desire to produce a pleasing variety. And in that desire
itself, I think, we may well recognize an inheritance from Hellenistic art with its well-defined and
constant tendency towards realistic individual treatment. The aim just mentioned finds its striking
expression in the care which the artist has taken to make his figures turn their heads in varying
directions. As we let the panels of angels pass before us from left to right, in accordance with the
order in which they were meant to present themselves to a visitor of the shrine performing the
pradakṣiṇa, we find that the heads are generally turned alternately to the right and the left. As
the general direction of the eyes corresponds to that of the head, and there is present also an
upward inclination of the gaze, more or less pronounced, the impression is cleverly created, for
a beholder passing at the distance marked by the width of the circular passage, that each individual
figure in the successive groups of angels is seeking to attract his attention. Thus the figures i–ii,
iii–iv in the north-eastern arc, and viii–ix in the south-eastern, form pairs in which the gazes
directed to the right and the left seem to be fixed on the person who stands in the middle before
them. We may suppose that the same arrangement was observed for the heads in the panels vi
and vii, no longer extant, which flanked the east window.
Similar The artistic device here aimed at is of particular interest because we find it illustrated by
devices in
Fayyûm exactly corresponding examples among the scanty remains of Hellenistic pictorial art which have
portraits,
etc. survived in the Near East from approximately the same period. Thus, in the wall-paintings of the
Palmyrene catacombs, dating from about A.D. 259, which Professor J. Strzygowski has discussed
in a masterly fashion, the heads of the medallion portraits decorating each wall are all represented
as turning towards the beholder, who is supposed to face it from the middle.² A similar variation
in the movement of the heads, he observes, is typical of the encaustic portrait panels recovered
from the tombs of the Fayyûm ; there, too, the eyes are shown as fixed in a steady gaze upon
the beholder.
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
11
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
21
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
31
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
41
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
51
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
61
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
71
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
81
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
91
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
101
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
111
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
121
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
131
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
141
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
151
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
161
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
171
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
181
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
191
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
201
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
211
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
221
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
231
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
241
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
251
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
261
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
271
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
281
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
291
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
301
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
312
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
322
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
332
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
342
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
352
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
362
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
372
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
382
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
392
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
402
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
412
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
422
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
432
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
442
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
452
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
462
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
472
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
482
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
492
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
502
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
512
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
522
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
532
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
542
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
552
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
562
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
572
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
582
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
592
.
594
595
596
597
598
.
.
.
602
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
612
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
622
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
632
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
642
.
.
.
646
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics(国立情報学研究所)
and
The Toyo Bunko(東洋文庫). All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。