国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0095 Serindia : vol.3
セリンディア : vol.3
Serindia : vol.3 / 95 ページ(白黒高解像度画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000183
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

within on the right of Fig. 262. Its top bears brickwork manifestly of a later date. Except for a decayed mosque near the south-west corner, the interior of the circumvallation is entirely clear of structural remains above ground. But small terraces of natural clay, divided by a network of narrow sunk alleys, evidently once served as basements or foundations for dwellings. On these basement terraces I frequently noticed round holes, 2 to 3 feet in diameter, which manifestly had been excavated for the purpose of storing grain, etc. The narrow alleys dividing these little *insulae* must also have been excavated from the hard clay soil. But this became fully intelligible to me only after I had seen the streets similarly cut into the ground, but to a greater depth and wider, at the site of Yār-khoto, the ancient Turfān capital (Fig. 273). Close to the north and west walls passes the stream from Ilikul which serves to irrigate the fields of Lapchuk. Beyond this stretches the area already referred to which has been used as the burial-ground of the village, evidently for a prolonged period. Close to the south wall are the homesteads of Lapchuk scattered among fields.

I did not succeed in obtaining any useful local information about the ruined town. But from such indications as the badly decayed state of the walls, in spite of very massive construction, and the total absence of habitations within could furnish, it appeared to me very probable that the circumvallation dated from a period preceding, though not, perhaps, by a long time, the first introduction of Islām. The existence of this old fortified town and of the ruined Buddhist shrines north of it, which probably belong to the Uigur period just like those of Ilikul, has a special historical interest in view of the evidence which recent researches of Professor Pelliot have brought to light as to the mention of Lapchuk by early Chinese records under the name of Na-chih 納職.¹³ It appears from the texts which he has discussed with much critical care and learning that Na-chih, mentioned by the T'ang Annals as a sub-prefecture in A.D. 630 and located by other Chinese texts, including one of the early ninth century, to the west or south-west of Hāmi,¹⁴ was founded in the sixth century A.D. as a colony of 'barbarians' who had emigrated from Shan-shan, i.e. the present Lop region. M. Pelliot has further demonstrated, in what appears to me a very convincing fashion, that the Chinese *Na-chih*, in accordance with certain rules of early Chinese phonetics, is meant to reproduce an older form **Lop-chuk*. This itself seems made up of *Lop*, the indigenous name of Shan-shan, the antiquity of which is proved by the *Nob* of my Tibetan documents from Mirān and Hsüan-tsang's *Na-fu-po*, and the well-known Turki suffix *-chuk*. Thus the name Lapchuk presents itself as an appropriate designation for the old colony founded in Hāmi territory by Lop emigrants.

The antiquity proved for the settlement of which the ruined town marks the northern extremity justifies my adding here some notes on what I was able to observe about the ground visited on my ride further down the valley. The homesteads of Lapchuk, counted at over a hundred, lie scattered among gardens and luxuriant orchards, which stretch for a distance of about a mile below the old site. The fields belonging to the village extend for some three miles further down between the flanking gravel plateaus; but most of this large and carefully terraced area of cultivation is now sown only every third year, as the available water was declared to be insufficient for irrigating the whole. It seemed as if want of adequate labour for tilling and manuring might also have something to do with this present limitation.