National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0261 Southern Tibet : vol.3
Southern Tibet : vol.3 / Page 261 (Grayscale High Resolution Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000263
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

water-parting of the Brahmaputra must here approach much closer to the river and
run in a south-easterly direction. On the 89th meridian, it descends as low as the
30th parallel in the Shiang Lahu range, which appears to be connected with the
great Ninjin-thángla range of snowy peaks to the south of the Jáng Namcho or
Tengri-nor lake with a trend to the north-east, for it gives the head-waters of the
Ki-chu or Lhása river from its southern slope, as well as other important streams
further east, regarding which our information is still very imperfect. To the north-
east we find the Nák-chu-kha or Hota Sanpo, a large river that issues from the
Chargut lake about north latitude 32° and east long. 89°, and flows eastward, having
its drainage area on the south, bounded by the water-parting between it and the
Brahmaputra basin.»

Atkinson thus believed, from Nain Sing's exploration, in one range of lofty
peaks north of the Tsangpo. He regards Nain Sing's rivers, Chachu and Charta, as
coming from this range, which does not agree with his map, where the Charta pierces
the range. His general physical geography in these regions is very clever, — it has
only one fault: to be built upon descriptions of rivers and ranges which do not exist
in reality. The Dumphu-chu of Nain Sing has turned everything, not least the
water-parting, upside down. The same is the case with the river Nák-chu-kha and
with the north-eastern continuation of the Nien-chen-tang-la. He believes that the
lakes on the plateau-land are connected by the Nák-chu-kha, which finds its outlet
in one of the great rivers to the east of the Dihong.¹ He regards the northern part
of Tibet as a great uninhabited plain or a plateau of great elevation.

But he also says that so little is known of the Tibetan plateau, »that it is
impossible to offer any general account of it based upon actual observation; but as
far as we may judge from those parts that have been explored, it appears that the
surface is, with few exceptions, broken up into a mass of mountains, the general
elevation of which, valleys as well as ridges, is very great; and there seems no reason
for supposing that either the Himálaya or Kuenlun have any definite special existence
as mountain ranges apart from the general elevated mass of which they appear to
be the two opposite faces . . .²»

To a certain extent he is right in joining Himalaya and Kwen-lun intimately
with the great bulk of the highland, but on the other hand all the different systems
are separate individuals, which, taken together, form this immense plateau of
the earth's crust. The interior of this high-land he believes to be broken up into
a mass of mountains. The parallelism between all these different systems could of
course not be known in 1882. Only 25 years later was the first attempt made to
show that this parallelism prevails all over Tibet and that Tibet is what the Ger-
mans call a »Faltenland», and as such greater than any other on the earth.³