国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0367 Overland to India : vol.2
インドへの陸路 : vol.2
Overland to India : vol.2 / 367 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000217
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

YI.VIII

PERSIAN DEPRESSIONS   181

draining into the lake was salt.' From Wells's description and his detailed map we can understand that sandhills cannot possibly be formed on the southern shore of the Niris lake. There is no room for them, for the lake is shut in between well-clothed hills. This is quite different from the environment of the lakes in Eastern Persia. The climate here is more humid than in the east. Urmia, Niris, and Jas-morian lie in one and the same longitudinal valley, and the situation of Niris in relation to the other two makes it quite natural that it should be a mean between them, with more water and more constant than Jas-morian, and with less water and more ephemeral than Urmia. And as to the development of sand, we find that it is really a strikingly characteristic feature of east Persian lakes.

We shall return, in a later chapter, to the question of sand distribution in Persia.

In a country which so much abounds in deserts and desert formations of various kinds in different stages of development, the language must have several different terms to denote these conceptions. And such is the actual case. The usual, general term denoting no especial type is biaban, from bi = without, ab = water, and an, the plural

,1   termination. So the whole word means without water of
any kind. A diminutive of biaban is biabanek (small desert, or half desert). This word I have not found in colloquial use, but as a geographical name for the region round

d Khur.

Less common is the Arabic word sehra, plural sehara,

}   which in the African Sahara denotes plain country in

t   general, and desert in particular. In Persia it signifies,

according to Polak, uninhabited land. Deshi can be most closely translated by waste steppe, or plain. It is certainly

p a transitional form between steppe and desert, a form,

r therefore, which does not exclude the occurrence of vegeta-

r tion. The combination Desht-i-Kevir involves a contradiction, for kevir excludes all vegetation, which desht does not. I have never heard the combination Desht-i-Lut, but it is common on the latest maps, and it is quite possible

11 that it is used in certain parts. When, however, the word

1 Proceedings of the Roy. Geogr. Soc. vol. v. (1883), p. 138.