National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0429 India and Tibet : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / Page 429 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000295
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

 

CHINA AND CHUMBI VALLEY 355

have been effectively opened for three years, as provided

in Article VI. ; and that in the meantime the Tibetans

should have faithfully complied with the terms of the

said Convention in all other respects. On December 23,

1907, the Chinese Government addressed a note to our

Minister, stating that as the final instalment was ready for

payment on January 1, 1908, we should withdraw on

the above date the British troops in temporary occupation

of the Chumbi Valley."

The Indian Government pointed out that the Chinese

ignored the condition that evacuation was contingent on the

Tibetans faithfully complying with the Treaty in every

respect. Instances tending to show that this condition,

and the condition that the trade-marts should be effectively

opened had not been fulfilled, had already been reported to

the Secretary of State. The fact that the Tibetan authorities

had recently failed to provide accommodation, except at

extortionate rent, for Indian traders supplied evidence of

this. The Tibetans also imposed unauthorized restrictions

on trade by accustomed routes across the northern frontier

of Sikkim, and on traders going from the United Provinces

to marts in Western Tibet. The fact that, in spite of the

maintenance of the telegraph service being provided for in

Article III. of the Peking Convention, there had been

serious recrudescence of interruptions to it since Mr.

Chang's visit to Tibet, further illustrated the attitude of

the Tibetans. There had also been obstruction to postal

communication with Gartok. It could not, then, be said

that marts had been effectively opened since Mr. Chang's

visit, whatever might have been the case before.

We should presumably have been entitled to claim,

under the letter of the Treaty, that, until the trade-marts

had been effectively opened for three years, and until the

terms of the Convention had in the meantime been com-

plied with in all other respects, the valley should be

retained by us. It was not the desire of the Government

of India to suggest rigid enforcement of the Convention

in this respect. They bore in mind, however, the decision

of His Majesty's Government that if, after commencement

* Blue-book, IV., p. 136.