国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0467 Southern Tibet : vol.7
南チベット : vol.7
Southern Tibet : vol.7 / 467 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000263
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

 

RAWLINSON'S CRITICISM.

rigidly to exclude it from geography for the future.» (Yule's Essay in Captain Wood's Journey to the Source of the River Oxus, p. LV). SEVERTSOFF'S opinion is this : »The name of `Bolor' in the sense of an entire mountain system, which I have denominated the Southern Tsun-lin, should, in my opinion, properly be excluded from the geography of Asia, because it is really not the name of a mountain system, and in this sense is therefore an error. Bolor is the name of a river, and of a town situated upon it; and is besides, according to Central Asiatic usage, the term for the one mountain from which the Bolor issues. They perpetuate an error by giving this name to a mountain region which has for several ages borne another appellation, instead of one that is general, and at the same time most appropriate, viz., rI'sun-lin.» Journ. Roy. Geogr. Society. Vol. XL. 1870, p. 398.

I Baber's Memoirs, p. 85.

2 England and Russia in the East. London, 1875, p. 231.

307

which is given in the German Baron's Memoir, and the citation of actual words from the Kafir language, I can only suppose that the author borrowed from Mollah Nejib's 'Memoir', published in the Appendix to Elphinstone's 'Cabul', Vol. II, p. 373; but in that case the

k Russian MSS. must be later by some years than the date of 18o6 which it bears, as

Elphinstone's first edition was published in 1814.

;t   To change the date of 18o6 into something after 1814, simply for getting

I.< it to suit the accusation, seems to be a bad and unjust argument. When, on the

kit; other hand, KHANIKOFF brought forward an argument in favour of the authenticity

of the Baron's travels, showing that his map contained an accurate delineation of

Iskender-kul, which was a recent discovery unknown even to LEHMANN in 1840,

Rawlinson replied that Klaproth might have obtained his knowledge of the lake

from BABER'S Memoires, »where it is accurately described, though the locality has

not hitherto been recognized, owing to Erskine having read the name as Kan in

stead of Fan». This argument is also very weak, for all Baber says is: »Among

the mountains of Kan there is a large lake, which may be about a kos in circum

ference, and is very beautiful.» I How from this description an »accurate delineation»

could be produced is difficult to see.

3'   Sir Henry Rawlinson seems to have taken the greatest interest in searching

for evidence against the greatest orientalist of the first third of the century. A few

years later he again returned to the question, and sacrificed in a book of his2 a

h disproportional space to the MSS of Georg Ludwig von —. Here he writes:

Suspicion has probably fallen on Klaproth because he is known at different periods

of his life to have been engaged in the preparation of reports on Central Asia of a secret

! and confidential nature. One of these reports, indeed, 'On the Geographical and Political

Condition of the Countries intervening between Russia and India', is said to have been

purchased by our Government at the time of the Afghan war for the enormous sum of

one thousand guineas, and to be still reposing in the archives of our Foreign Office ... .

This manuscript has been since examined and found to exhibit certain proof of having been forged by Klaproth.

It should have been interesting »not only in the interests of science, but with

I a view to its possible bearing on the vexed question of the authorship of the ano

nymous Russo-German manuscript», to hear something about this »certain proof».