National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0262 Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2
Explorations in Turkestan : Expedition of 1904 : vol.2 / Page 262 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000178
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

Major's index of the position of the facets the horse of Anau ranks very close to
*Equus stenonis* and the horse of Solutré. In the following table I give again the
mean values of this dimension for the different horses:

Anau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26.0 Stenonis, after Major. . . . . . .32.5
Przewalski. . . . . . . . . . . . .27.0 Solutré. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.1
Asinus, after Major. . . . . . .28.9 Cardamone. . . . . . . . . . . . . .34.0
Siberian horse, Tscherski . . . 32.0

In the neck of the astragalus the horses of Anau and of the Bohemian localities
resemble throughout *Equus stenonis* and the recent horse. Kowalewski says that
the cuboidal facet of the astragalus (which in the tridactyl ancestors of the horse
was useful in transferring the weight of the body to the metatarsus externus) is
very small in Hipparion and the horses and stands too steep to support the cuboi-
deum. Moreover, Major has shown that it is still less steep in the horses than in
Hipparion, but he admits that in *Equus stenonis* it is steeper in some specimens
than in others. Among the Anau specimens small differences of this kind can be
observed, showing that this characteristic is in a preeminent degree dependent on
the individual use of the limbs.

*Naviculare tarsi.*—From Anau we have two specimens which were not con-
sidered in the earlier chapter. For comparison, I have only those of *Equus prze-
walskii* and of a recent domestic horse. In the Anau horse, the indentation in
the posterior edge of the naviculare (first mentioned by Kowalewski and of which
he finds the first trace in *Paleotherium medium*) is uncommonly pronounced and
deep, giving the tarsus great strength. In comparing this part of the naviculare
with that in *Equus przewalskii* we see that this indentation is here more round and
hollowed out and not provided with so sharp-edged a notch as in the Anau horse.
I find in the horses of Solutré and Kesslerloch the same condition as in *Equus
przewalskii*.

We know that the posterior edge of the astragalus joint is occupied by two
projections which border this indentation. In *Equus caballus* the outer one usually
projects strongly and is, as already stated by Rütimeyer (p. 11), much more
strongly developed than in Hipparion. In the Anau horse the outer one projects
the more; but in contrast with *Equus przewalskii* and the horse of Solutré, both of
the Anau specimens show it connected in an almost straight line with the inner
projection, and not separated by a deep notch as in those horses. Thus *Equus
pumpellii* is, in this respect, very similar to *Equus stenonis*, in which the outer
projections are described by Major as equal.

The articulating surfaces for the cuneiforme I and II, which in *Equus cabal-
lus recens* are much enlarged transversely, while in Hipparion and *Equus stenonis*
the fore-and-aft diameter predominates, show in *Equus pumpellii* and *przewalskii*
the same relation as in *Equus stenonis*.

The articulating surfaces for the cuboideum: As Major observes, the center
of gravity in the tarsus has been steadily moved forward from geological to recent
time, hence the posterior articulating surfaces diminish in size and the anterior
surfaces increase. The posterior one of the two existing articulating surfaces is,
especially in Hipparion, much extended from above down and stands here almost