National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books
|
|
Color Thumbnail -
Table of Contents -
Page Number -
Biliographic Information (Metadata) -
Caption -
Color Image -
Gray HighRes. Image -
Facing Pages -
Graphics -
| 0483 |
Southern Tibet : vol.7 |
Citation Information
OCR Text
CHAPTER XXXV.
RICHTHOFEN.
Already the title of RICHTHOFEN'S standard work,¹ the most remarkable and
epoch-making ever written on the geography of Asia, points out the difference be-
tween it and its two great predecessors, RITTER'S *Asien*, and HUMBOLDT'S *Asie
Centrale*. It is all built up on his own personal observations so far as China and
some other parts of Asia are concerned. Ritter and Humboldt had to work their
hard ways through heaps of documents. And still no other works have in the
same degree developed geography to a science, all over the world. Humboldt's
own journey to the Kirgis Steppe and Altai in 1829 did not lead to any great
geographical discoveries, but with his sharp and trained eye he understood the
general building of the continent, and his work on Central Asia is, in spite of several
natural mistakes, a milestone in the history of Asiatic researches.
Comparable with it is Ritter's *Asien*, of which the first volume appeared in
1832, and which contains almost everything known about the great continent at
his time.
Germany had given to the world a third Asiatic scholar who was greater
than his great countrymen, FERDINAND VON RICHTHOFEN. For, while those were,
to a great extent, compilators, Richthofen was one of the scientifically best prepared
travellers who ever lived, and regarding the physical geography of Asia, unrivalled.
Richthofen says of his two countrymen that they were no mere compilators in the
ordinary sense of the word on account of their sharp understanding of the great
features and the systematic, critical and philosophic way in which they interpreted
the material existing from the very remotest times to their own days.
Richthofen shows how Humboldt's artificial and geometrical construction of the
boundaries of »Central Asia» was not at all in harmony with the geological and
interior structure of the continent, and, therefore, soon had to disappear, — and he
1
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
17
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
28
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
38
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
49
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
60
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
70
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
81
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
92
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
105
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
117
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
128
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
138
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
150
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
161
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
177
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
190
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
202
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
214
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
225
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
237
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
251
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
263
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
277
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
291
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
302
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
315
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
329
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
342
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
352
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
363
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
375
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
386
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
397
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
407
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
420
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
432
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
444
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
457
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
467
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
478
.
.
481
482
483
484
485
.
.
488
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
499
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
510
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
520
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
530
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
541
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
552
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
563
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
573
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
583
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
593
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
605
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
615
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
625
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
635
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
646
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
656
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
666
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
681
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
693
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
704
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
714
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
726
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
737
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
747
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
758
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
773
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
788
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
801
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
813
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
833
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
848
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
864
.
.
.
.
|
.
.
.
.
876
.
.
.
.
|
888
Copyright (C) 2003-2026
National Institute of Informatics
and
The Toyo Bunko. All Rights Reserved.
