National Institute of Informatics - Digital Silk Road Project
Digital Archive of Toyo Bunko Rare Books

> > > >
Color New!IIIF Color HighRes Gray HighRes PDF   Japanese English
0128 The Book of Ser Marco Polo : vol.1
The Book of Ser Marco Polo : vol.1 / Page 128 (Color Image)

New!Citation Information

doi: 10.20676/00000269
Citation Format: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR Text

 

 

i

F

INTRODUCTION

I.~

More trustworthy traditions, recorded among the Family

Histories of Venice, but still no more it is believed than

traditions, represent the Family of Polo as having come from

Sebenico in Dalmatia, in the II th century.* Before the end of

the century they had taken seats in the Great Council of

the Republic ; for the name of Domenico Polo is said to be

subscribed to a grant of 1094, that of Pietro Polo to an act

of the time of the Doge Domenico Michiele in 1122, and that of

a Domenico Polo to an acquittance granted by the Doge

Domenico Morosini and his Council in 1153.1-

The ascertained genealogy of the "Traveller, however, begins

only with his grandfather, who lived in the early part of the

13th century.

Two branches of the Polo Family were then recognized,

distinguished by the confini or Parishes in which they lived, as

Polo of S. Geremia, and Polo of S. Felice. ANDREA POLO of

S. Felice was the father of three sons, MARCO, NICOLO, and

MAFFEO. And N icolo was the Father of our Marco.

14. Till quite recently it had never been precisely ascer-

tained whether the immediate family of our Traveller belonged

to the Nobles of Venice properly so called, who had

Claims to

be styled   seats in the Great Council and were enrolled in the

noble.   Libro d'Oro. Ramusio indeed styles our Marco Nobile

and Mag nivico, and Rusticiano, the actual scribe of the

Traveller's recollections, calls him "sajes et noble citaiens de

Venece," but Ramusio's accuracy and Rusticiano's precision were

scarcely to be depended on. Very recently, however, since the

subject has been discussed with accomplished students of the

Venice Archives, proofs have been found 'establishing Marco's

personal claim to nobility, inasmuch as both in judicial decisions

and in official resolutions of the Great Council, he is designated

Nobilis Vir, a formula which would never have been used in such

documents (I am assured) had he not been technically noble.+

* The Genealogies of Marco Barbaro specify 1033 as the year of the migration to

Venice ; on what authority does not appear (MS. copy in Museo Civico at Venice).

t Caj5j5ellari, u. s., and Barbaro. In the same century we find (T125, I 195) indi-

cations of Polos at Torcello, and of others (ii6o) at Equileo, and (1 179, 1206) Lido

Maggiore ; in 1154 a Marco Polo of Rialto. Contemporary with these is a family of

Polos (1139, 1183, 1193, I2o1) at Chioggia (Documents and Lists of Documents from various Archives at Venice).

$ See Appendix C, Nos. 4, 5, and 16. It was supposed that an autograph of

Marco as member of the Great Council had been discovered, but this proves to be a