国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
| |||||||||
|
Southern Tibet : vol.4 | |
南チベット : vol.4 |
4 2 6
SOME REMARKS TO THE HEIGHTS AND DISTANCES.
Page I I o line 6 from the top Kelyang stands for Kebyang
» 110 » 2 » » bottom 5,15 I » )) 5,094
» 120 » 5 » » » 4,169 » » 4,069
» 122 » 3 » » top Totlung » » Tolling
)) I 2 2 » 2 )) )) bottom Sarjer » » Sasser
E. THE MAP IN 1 : 200,000.
In 1918 Professor KARL D. P. ROSÉN published a scientific critical examination
of the reliability and accuracy of my Tibetan panoramas, reproduced in a reduced
scale in the Atlas of Panoramas.' He compared my sketches with the photographic
panoramas made from the same points as some of them, and arrived at the con-
clusion that the exactitude was so great that it would be a pity not to make all
possible use of the sketches. Only to a very small extent was this done by Lieutenant
KJELLSTRÖM when he constructed the map, in i : 300,000.
Professor Rosén therefore advised me to have a new and chiefly hypsometrical
map drawn where all the material of the map in i : 300,000 should be worked out
more in detail from the morphological data contained in my panoramas, and the
mountains should be sketched with approximate isohypses or »Gefühlsisohypsen» as
the German term runs.
The new map which forms a separate atlas to this work, was to be drawn
by Colonel H. BYSTRÖM. To keep the expenses within reasonable bounds we decided
to make the map only in black, brown, blue and red. The range of sight of
every panorama was to be marked in the map. To make it possible for students
directly to compare this map with the map of my journey in 1899-1902 published
in the atlas of my Scientific Results, we found it appropriate to have the new map
reproduced in the same scale as the first one, or in 1: 200,000. The larger scale
also had the advantage of affording more space for morphological details. In cases
where discrepancies existed between the absolute altitudes as given in the text and
on the map in i : 300,000, all necessary corrections should be made, and the altitudes
regarded as definitive.
Finally it was decided not to force my route into the net of co-ordinates, but
to construct the map entirely upon the basis of my original field-maps. Also in this
respect it would be quite equal to my map of 1899-1902, and with regard to
accuracy both maps could be directly compared with one another.
I have said above, p. 203, that the length of my route from Tankse through
Tibet and back to Tankse was, in my fieldbooks, found to be 4,27o km. in length.
If the field survey had been correct, the polygon would have been closed at Tankse.
I Vicie Ymer, 1918, p. 1 2 5 et seq.
|
Copyright (C) 2003-2019
National Institute of Informatics(国立情報学研究所)
and
The Toyo Bunko(東洋文庫). All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。