国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0659 Scientific Results of a Journey in Central Asia, 1899-1902 : vol.2
1899-1902年の中央アジア旅行における科学的成果 : vol.2
Scientific Results of a Journey in Central Asia, 1899-1902 : vol.2 / 659 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000216
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

GENERAL HYDROGRAPHICAL RELATIONS OF THE TARIM BASIN.   523

ment-basins. A river like the Jarkent-darja possesses of course to an incomparable degree a greater power of enlarging its catchment-area than does, for instance, the Kerija-darja. Under any and every circumstance therefore the gathering-grounds of the latter stream must of necessity cover a smaller area. In this way the amount of the precipitation, the dimensions of the several rivers, and the areas of their respective catchment-basins must be proportionally related the one to the other. For this reason the breadth of the peripheral zone of the Kwen-lun must increase towards the west. To a certain extent the same law would appear to hold good with regard to the southern peripheral zone of the Tibetan plateau where the catchment basin of the Indus broadens towards the west all the way from its origin near the lakes of Manassarowar.

The following table of the catchment-areas of the streams draining into the East Turkestan basin makes no claims to strict accuracy, for we do not possess sufficiently accurate maps of the peripheral zone; still it will serve to give an approximate idea of the relative size of the different areas. The calculation has been made with the help of a polar planimeter on sheet 62 of Siielers Handatlas. The very smallness of the scale on which the map is drawn precludes any great accuracy of detail; nevertheless the sheet in question is the best general map of Central Asia that we as yet possess. The first step was to prick out the boundaries of each catchment-area, that is to say the upper parts only of each individual stream, within which it may be supposed to receive feeders from the mountains. The upper boundary, the water-parting, admitted of being followed with relative certainty; but with regard to the lower boundary, the dividing-line between the gathering-area and the • lowlands, considerable uncertainty exists, and the boundary in that direction is to a large extent pure guess-work. Yet for the object we have here in view, the results may be regarded as being sufficiently accurate. I have of course given them in round numbers.

River.   Area in sq. km.

Kaschgar-darja     56,000

Ak-su-darja and Tauschkan-darja     42,000

A small area between these two     8,000

The Tien-schan between the Ak-su-darja and the Chajdu-gol     38,000

Chajdu-gol (down to Baghrasch-köl)     32,000

Baghrasch-köl     8,000

Jarkent-darja     64,000

Kara-kasch 1 Chotan-darja J     2 I,000

Jurun-kasch J   l     t 6,000

A small area between the Jarkent-darja and the Chotan-darja     12,000

Kerija-darja     16,000

A small area between the Jurun-kasch and the Kerija-darja . .     i0,coo

Nija-darja, Tolan-chodscha, and several other small streams .     15,000

Bostan-toghrak, Möldscha, and several minor streams     i 3,000

Kara-muran     18,0œo

Tschertschen-darja     17,000

The small brooks of the Astin-tagh from Kum-bulak onwards     30,000

Kuruk-tagh     30,000