国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0037 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 37 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

DISCRETION LEFT TO AGENT   11

All that he asked, and more than he asked, Rhodes gave

him, and then despatched him, saying, 6 6 Now, I don't want

to hear of you again till I get a telegram saying your job

is done."

These are, of course, ideal methods of conveying

instructions to an agent, which it is not always possible for

.a high official to give. Lord Curzon would, I know, have

liked to give similar instructions to me, and, as far as pro-

viding money, staff, military support, etc., he did. But,

with the closer interconnection of public affairs, public

business is now so complicated that it is not, I suppose,

possible to leave to an agent the same amount of discretion

that Warren Hastings did to Bogle. Still, great results

in many fields, and, what is more, great men, have been

produced by the use of Warren Hastings' method of

selecting the fittest agent, and then leaving everything in

his hands. I do not see that any better results have

been obtained by utilizing human agents as mere

telephones. If the conduct of affairs has become com-

plicated, that does not appear to be any reason in itself

for abandoning the method. It appears only a reason for

principals and agents rising to the higher occasion while

still pursuing the old successful method. Ease of com-

munication has brought nations more closely together and

complicated affairs, but it has also made possible readier

personal communication between principal and agent.

And therefore there is need not so much for curtailing

the discretion of the agent while he is at work as for

utilizing the greater facility for personal intercourse now

possible. In conversation the agent will be able to

impress his principals with whatever local and personal

difficulties he has to contend with, and the means

required for carrying out their object, and they will be

able to impress him with the limits outside which it is

impossible to allow him to act. It is a clear certainty that

the present tendency to concentrate, not merely control,

but also direction, in London, cannot go on for ever. An

Empire like ours, immense in size and immensely com-

plicated, cannot be managed in detail from headquarters.

The time must come when the House of Commons and