国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0476 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 476 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

402 THE ATTITUDE OF THE TIBETANS

Chinese Government entertained no thoughts of such a

course, which would be a contravention of the treaty

stipulations between England arid China. Mr. Max Müller

was reminded by Natung that blame was formerly imputed

to the Chinese Government because they did not enforce

observation of Treaty engagements on the part of the

Tibetans, and that the signature of the 'Trade Regulations

of 1908 by a Tibetan delegate had been insisted on by His

Majesty's Government, because they thought that Regula-

tions would otherwise not be conformed to by 'Tibetans.

He stated, as regards troops in Tibet, that none of Chao

Erh-feng's force had entered Lhasa territory, that force

being still in Derge and Chiamdo. The 2,000 men sent to

Lhasa were a separate body of troops from Szechuan, and,

beyond the Arnban's normal escort and the guard at the

post-stations, these were the only additional troops in the

country. The right to station troops in Tibet had always

rested with China, and the object of' sending the recent

reinforcements was merely to secure observance of Treaty

obligations, to protect the trade-marts, and to maintain

peace and order. The person of the Dalai Laina himself,

he assured the Minister repeatedly, was alone affected

by the steps which the Chinese Government had taken.

Precedents for removing Lamas were numerous ; in 1710,

owing to misconduct, the sixth Dalai Lama had been

removed. No action would be taken which would disturb

the Lama Church or the existing administrative system

in Tibet. It was absurd to suppose that the Chinese

Government would interfere with Lamaism, as there were

Lamaist functionaries at the Peking Court, and millions

of Lamaists among the Mongol subjects of China. With

regard to the charges that monasteries had been burnt,

one only had been destroyed by Chao Erh-feng, more than

a year previously, because a Chinese Amban had been

ambushed and killed, together with thirty of his escort, by

the Lamas.

On the receipt of the Chinese reply, Lord Morley

telegraphed to the Viceroy for the views of the Govern-

merit of India ; but at the same time he impressed on

them that they should bear in mind that it was essential