国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0483 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 483 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

DEFECTS IN OUR SYSTEM   409

put in control of India who has not even seen it from the

window of a railway-carriage, or probably spoken to a

single Indian or Anglo-Indian in his life. Even when

there does happen to be available a politician who has

visited India and specially studied it, who, being a peer,

has naturally some sympathy with the aristocratic inclina-

tion of Indian methods of rule, and who, being a Liberal,

might be expected to infuse into any too aristocratic

ill need of revision. The composition and action of the

methods a sufficiency of the English democratic spirit, he

is put (like Lord Crewe) to control Colonial affairs, while

another politician who is noted for his specially demo-

!R cratic inclinations, and whose knowledge of India is

purely literary, is put to control India. Such methods

may in practice produce very fair results, just as the

t~ House of Lords does, on the whole, work remarkably

well. But better methods would produce better results.

11 By the present system the confidence of administrators

ii can never be secured, and for that reason alone it stands

House of Lords are now subject to criticism, because peers,

not being elected, are supposed to be out of touch with

the feeling of the people. But, after all, the peers do live

in Great Britain, they do know the country and the

people and the conditions to a very great extent ; and

if, knowing all this, they do not yet possess the confidence

of the people, how much less can it be expected that

Englishmen in India could have any real confidence in

the present method of governing India from England ?

If the composition and methods of the House of Lords

need revision, how much more do the composition and

methods of the Imperial Cabinet need reform ?

Again, agents in India can hardly help feeling that

under the existing system less attention is paid to their

matured views than to the opinions of inexperienced

British electors. Not only is it that the latter are near,

while the former are distant, but also that the latter can

turn the London controllers of Indian affairs out of office,

while the former have to run the risk of being turned out

themselves. It stands to reason that the Indian Secretary

must be looking more to the will and wishes of the electors