国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0501 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 501 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

ADVANTAGES OF INTIMACY   427

k

ki failed. We have given the other line three trials, and

a on each occasion it has succeeded. All the forbearance

ii and patience which we showed in countermanding the

iii despatch of Macaulay's Mission, and in trusting to the

10 consideration of the Chinese and Tibetans, only led to

ii the Sikkim campaign. Similar forbearance after 1888

merely led to the armed Mission of 1904. And the desire

4 to have as little as possible to do with Tibet since 1904

has, after all, resulted in the reassembling of troops upon

ik our frontier and protests to Peking. I am not contend-

i ing that no forbearance, moderation, and patience should

H be shown. My own proceedings are good enough testi-

mony of my belief in the efficacy of these qualities. My

contention is that there must be moderation even in

!' moderation, and forbearance even in forbearing, and that

~i the obstinate determination to have nothing, or as little

as possible, to do with Tibet has brought on exactly

what we wanted to avoid. On the other hand, when

t we have gone forward and made efforts to get in touch

with the Tibetans, to understand them and explain

ourselves to them, a more settled state has always

I resulted. After Bogle's and 'T'urner's Missions in the

M eighteenth century, and after the Mission of 1904, there

was a perceptibly better feeling between us and the

it Tibetans, all tending to that orderliness on our frontier

F which is what we most desire. The closer contact and

more intimate touch, besides being the more humane

method, diminishes rather than increases the risk of

trouble. As a case in point, I consider that if we had

had a representative at Lhasa this year, or even if our

agent at Gyantse had been able to proceed to Lhasa, the

present trouble need not have arisen. Knowing what

British officers are by their personal influence able to

accomplish, I believe that if Major O'Connor, or Major

Gurdon, or Major Dew, or one or other of a dozen similar

officers who are to be found in India, had been at Lhasa

last winter, he would have been able to nip this trouble in

the bud. And this not by giving the Tibetans out-and-

out support against their legitimate suzerain, but by

telling them frankly what the limits were beyond which it

r±~ .

;