国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0423 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 423 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

CHINESE PROPOSALS   349

partly in order that by the annual payment of the necessary

instalments they should formally recognize the binding

nature of the obligations entered into by them towards the

British Government. Should the annual instalments hence-

forth be paid by the Chinese Government, the punitive effect

of the indemnity would disappear, for it did not seem to Lord Lansdowne at all probable that the Chinese Government

would be able or willing to recover from the Tibetan

Government the sums paid on this account, and past

experience had proved that it was not in the power of

China to insist effectively on the fulfilment of the other

stipulations of the Convention.

Lord Lansdowne felt no doubt that the proposal had

1111 been made by the Chinese Government with the object of

p re-establishing their theoretical rights to supremacy over

!ßl1 the Tibetan Government, and probably also with the

object of insuring that the non-payment of the instal-

ments at their due date should not stand in the way of

i   the retirement of the British forces. Irrespectively of

these considerations, the refusal of the Chinese Govern-

ment to adhere to the Tibetan Agreement made it doubly

difficult for us to entertain the offer, and upon this ground

alone Lord Lansdowne considered that it should be

rejected. For acceptance would be tantamount to

admitting the intervention of China in relieving Tibet

from this portion of her obligations while avoiding all

responsibility for any other portion of the Convention.

Should the attitude of the Chinese Government

undergo a change in consequence of our refusal, and

should they intimate that they would adhere to the Agree-

ment, the situation would no doubt be altered, and might

be reconsidered by His Majesty's Government. Having

regard, however, to the complete inability shown by China

in the past to exercise effectual control over the Tibetan

authorities, it seemed to Lord Lansdowne that it would

be highly inadvisable to agree to any settlement which

might be regarded as an admission that responsibility for

the behaviour of the Tibetans would for the future rest

upon the Chinese Government.

This view of Lord Lansdowne's and Sir Ernest