国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0484 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 484 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

410   SOME CONCLUSIONS

who put him where he is, and who may remove him, than

to the advice of the agents in India whom he controls, and

that he will be more influenced by the English agitator

than by the Anglo-Indian subordinate. Indian adminis-

trators may say that a particular course is necessitated by

local conditions. The Secretary of State will say that the

man in the street in England will not understand or give

his approval, and the Indian administrator will go by the

board without appeal. An English Member of Parlia-

ment, holding strong views on an Indian question contrary

to those held by the Secretary of State, may, by express-

ing them with sufficient force, help to remove a Secretary

of State for India from office, or at least make him abandon

or modify his policy. An Anglo-Indian administrator, if

he holds views in opposition to those of the Secretary of

State, will not damage the latter, but he may ruin his own

career, as Sir Bampfylde Fuller ruined his, though events

have shown his views to have been right. Under such

conditions, Englishmen in India cannot be expected to

have confidence in the present plan of ruling India directly

from England.

One very natural result of this system is a resort to

half--measures   deporting seditious agitators, and letting

them out again a few months afterwards ; allowing an

agent in Tibet, but not at the capital, only halfway to it,

where he runs every bit as much risk and has one-tenth

part of the practical effect.

Secretaries of State lecture the Indian Government

about the wider view," the " larger Imperial interests,"

and so on ; but administrators in India have a suspicion

that, however broad the views of a Secretary of State may

be, they are probably not much longer than the distance

which separates him from the next General Election. In

any case, whether or no he is looking—as indeed he ought,

under the theory of our Constitution, to be looking—to the

next General Election, he cannot be expected to have the

same length of view as the Indian Government ; for he is,

after all, a bird of passage, in the India Office for a few

years and then not heard of there again. And as to the larger

Imperial interests, most British administrators are aware of