国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0420 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 420 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

346   NEGOTIATIONS WITH CHINA

sistent with the punishment of officials for being concerned

in its negotiation. Our Minister was further to state that

interference by Chinese officers with the freedom of the

dealings between the Tibetan Agent and the British Trade

Agent at Gyantse could not be permitted by His Majesty's

Government.

Again, on March 15,* he telegraphed that the right

of direct communication between the British Agent and

local Tibetan authorities must be firmly insisted on," and

the Chinese Government must be urged to send very clear

instructions in this sense to Chang."

Later, again, on June 27, Sir Edward Grey had

again to telegraph to our Minister to make further very

serious representations to the Chinese Government on the

subject. He was to draw their attention to the fact that

no friction existed between Captain O'Connor and the

Tibetans of the locality previous to the intervention of

Mr. Chang and Mr. Gow. We wanted nothing more

than freedom of trade, for our political interests were

safeguarded by clauses in the Treaty, and we had no wish

to assert any political influence ourselves. VVe did not

even desire to foster trade. We wished, indeed, to reduce

the establishment at the marts, and, if things went on

quietly, native instead of British agents might be appointed

there. But Sir Edward Grey considered that China was

trifling with her obligations in the matter of Tibet," and

he suggested that Mr. Gow should be entirely removed

from all employment in that country.

In consequence of these representations Mr. Gow was

withdrawn from Tibet, but only to be given a higher

appointment in a more popular part of the Chinese

Empire—the Directorship of Telegraphs at Mukden in

Manchuria—and the attitude of the Chinese in Tibet has

not yet really changed. Perhaps the reason may be found

in the hint given by Sir John Jordan, who, when the

Grand Secretary told him that the Wai.-wu-pu had

always been puzzled to know the causes of the friction

between Mr. Gow and. the )3ritish Trade Agent, expressed

his conviction that they lay in the fact that someone from * Blue-book, IV., p. 98.