IIIFカラー高解像度
国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
| |||||||||
|
| IIIFカラー高解像度 |
| India and Tibet : vol.1 | |
| インドとチベット : vol.1 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
引用情報
CHAPTER XXII
NEGOTIATIONS WITH CHINA
HATE had settled with Tibet direct, as was Lord Curzon's
chief object, and it had been proposed that China should
sign what was styled an Adhesion Agreement, formally
acknowledging the 'Tibetan 'Treaty. But Yu-tai, the
Resident at Lhasa, was instructed not to sign any such
agreement, and a Special Envoy was sent by the Chinese
Government to Calcutta to treat with the Indian Govern-
ment in the matter. Yu-tai himself had been specially
deputed for these negotiations regarding Tibet, but
apparently he was considered too complacent, and first of
all, Mr. Tang, and then Mr. Chang, were sent to Calcutta,
and from now onwards the Chinese showed first great
diplomatic insistence, and then great military activity, in
regard to 'Tibet, till, profiting by the jealousy between
us and the Russians, which had prevented our reaping
all the fruits of the Mission to Lhasa, they one by one
gathered those fruits themselves.
Nothing resulted from Mr. Tang's visit to India, and
ill-health caused him to return to China. But on April
27, 1906, in place of an Adhesion Agreement, a Conven-
tion was signed at Peking between Great Britain and
China MThich " confirmed " the Lhasa Convention of 1904.
In addition, Great Britain engaged " not to annex Tibetan
territory, or to interfere in the administration of Tibet " ;
while the Chinese Government undertook " not to permit
any other foreign State to interfere with the territory or
internal administration of Tibet." We were entitled to
lay down telegraph-lines to connect the trade-marts with
India. And it was laid down that the provisions of the
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2003-2019
National Institute of Informatics（国立情報学研究所）
and
The Toyo Bunko（東洋文庫）. All Rights Reserved.
本ウェブサイトに掲載するデジタル文化資源の無断転載は固くお断りいたします。