国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0431 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 431 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

OBJECTIONS TO EVACUATION   357

sidered of sufficient importance to justify a warning either

to Tibet or China that there had been a failure to comply

with the conditions on which our evacuation of Chumbi

depended. The fact that we kept silence at the time that

these incidents occurred rendered it impossible, in Mr.

Morley's opinion, to revive them now without exposing

ourselves to a charge of bad faith.

There remained the argument that the evacuation of

Chumbi would deprive us of our only practical means of

bringing pressure to bear on the Chinese Government to

expedite a satisfactory settlement of the negotiations now

in progress for the revision of the Tibetan Trade Regula-

tions. But though it might be inconvenient to be deprived

of this weapon, it appeared to Mr. Morley that, since by

our own action we were precluded, for the reasons stated

above, from alleging that there had been breaches of the

Lhasa Convention of such a nature as to necessitate our

retention of Chumbi, it would be an unjustifiable exten-

sion of the interpretation to be placed on the conditions

laid down in that Convention to maintain, as we should

have in effect to do, that the marts cannot be regarded as

effectively open till the revised Trade Regulations have

been satisfactorily settled. ru he Lhasa Convention clearly

contemplates the marts being conducted under the old

Regulations, which in form were sufficiently comprehen-

sive until the new ones were introduced. It contained

no stipulation, as it well might have done, that a revision

of the Regulations satisfactory to ourselves was essential

before the marts at Gyantse and elsewhere could be held

to have been effectively opened.

The possibility had also to be borne in mind, given the

peculiarities of Chinese diplomacy, that the continued

occupation of Chumbi might have no other effect than to

increase the obstinacy of the Chinese Government in the

matter of the revision of the Regulations. In that case,

as time went on, our position would have become increas-

ingly difficult, and if our occupation was seriously pro-

tracted, as might not improbably have been the result of

delaying evacuation, the whole policy of His Majesty's

Government in Asia would to a certain degree be stultified.