国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0496 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 496 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

422   SOME CONCLUSIONS

to the exclusion of the Chinese, and when I suspected

an inclination of the Tibetans thus to exclude them, I

addressed both Chinese and Tibetans together. Further,

on leaving Lhasa I presented the Resident with the eight

or ten repeating-rifles I had among my articles for pres-

entation, and I gave no rifles to the Tibetans. My

estimate of the situation was that any influence we had

should be exerted to sustain the authority and position

of the Resident. Our presence in Chumbi would give us

the means of exercising physical pressure more readily

than the Chinese ever could ; the presence of the Chinese

at Lhasa itself would enable them to exert personal and

moral pressure more readily than we could. By working

together we could keep the Tibetans in order. They are

exceedingly childish and foolish, besides being excessively

obstinate in practical affairs. And if we and the Chinese

worked together, as the Amban and I had done at Lhasa

in 1904, we should, I thought, be able to preserve har-

monious relations between all three of us — Tibetans,

Chinese, and British alike.

But when Chinese action is such as to create unrest

instead of preserving order, when it upsets all the border

people and necessitates our assembling troops to keep the

frontier steady, then we have a need to intervene. And

this has been the nature of Chinese action lately. Except

the Afghans, I have not known any people quite so tactless

and provocative as the Chinese in dealing with a subject

race. Their haughtiness and the hatred they inspired were

remarked on a century ago by Manning. Long years of

slackness, indifference, and supercilious disdain of the

people, for whom no attempt is made to do anything, are

every now and then broken by some sudden and violent

effort. Chao Erh-feng's methods have formed the subject

of an impeachment by his own countrymen, and apart

from the question whether he used treachery or beheaded

prisoners, his regulations to the Tibetans of Batang to

adopt the queue and to wear trousers, the measures he

ordered for the breaking down of Lamaism, and his annexa-

tion of Derge, were all calculated to rouse the whole Lamaist

world. No one is more fully aware than myself that the