国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0310 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 310 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

254   THE TERMS

They saw, however, no reason why the presence of a

resident agent in Lhasa should be a lasting source of

irritation. For more than eighty years we had now had

an agent at Khatmandu, a capital the isolation of which

from foreign intrusion had been guarded hardly less

jealously than that of Lhasa itself, and that by a people

whose prowess had been proved in our own armies. The

hostilities which preceded the first appointment of a

British Minister at Peking, under the treaty of 1860, were

also far more serious than any opposition which had so far

been encountered, or was likely to be met with, on the way

to Lhasa. The Government of India saw, then, no

reason to anticipate greater risk in placing a Resident at

Lhasa than was incurred in sending a British representa-

tive to Khatmandu or Peking.

Despite the hostility which, under the influence and

leadership of the monkish faction, they had displayed

against us, the Tibetan people had no dislike for us as a

race, and there was nothing in the tolerant Buddhist creed

which counselled hostility to strangers of a different faith

or encouraged fanaticism. The exclusion of British sub-

jects and Europeans was merely based on a concordat of

the present dominant class in Tibet, and was not in any

way a religious obligation. The monks were at present

opposed to us, fearing the loss of their influence, but their

antipathy was based on suspicion and ignorance, and with

tact and patience it might be eradicated—a view which

was supported by the friendly relations which the Mission

was able to establish at Khamba Jong with ecclesiastical

Envoys from the Tashi Lama of Shigatse.

It had always to be borne in mind that subjects of all

her other neighbours—China, Nepal, and Kashmir--were

allowed freely to resort to, and trade in, 'Tibet, while

China and Nepal had official representatives at Lhasa. As

at Khatmandu, our agent would, like the Nepal repre-

sentative at Lhasa, abstain from all interference with the

internal administration of the country, and would confine

himself to watching over our trade interests and in guard-

ing against the introduction of foreign influences. His

presence, therefore, at Lhasa would be in no sense a