国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0352 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 352 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

286   THE NEGOTIATIONS

agree to point by point. I then addressed the Tibetans in

regard to Clause IX., which was the one I understood

they had least objection to. I explained to them that by

it we had not the least desire to supplant China in the

proposed the Resident should sign on behalf of the

Chinese Government, and China was not included in the

term foreign Power." We were not placing a British   i

Resident here at Lhasa, and we were not asking for any

railway or other concessions. What we asked in this   i

clause was merely what was in accordance with their   t

traditional policy. Did they agree to the clause ?   !i

They replied that they did not want to have anything

to do with foreign Powers. They would, therefore, be   â

able to agree to it.   D

The clause regarding the razing of fortifications was   i

then discussed, and they began to raise objections, but I cut   ,I

them short by observing that all the fortifications named   i

were in our hands, and would be destroyed whether they   i

agreed or not. The clause had been drafted by Govern-   i

ment before the fortifications were in our possession.   i

Their agreement was, therefore, merely a formality. They   ii

said that in that case they would agree.

We then discussed at length the clauses relating to

the opening of new trade-marts. They had an idea we   i

wished them to make a road from Gyantse to Gartok,   i

and to make big roads by blasting. I assured them that   1

all we wanted was that the roads from the frontier to   I

Gyantse, and from the frontier to Gartok, should be kept   1

in repair. We did not expect new roads to be con-   i

structed by them, but existing roads kept suitable for

trade purposes.

The sentence regarding the opening of more trade-

marts in future they very strongly objected to. I pointed

out, however, that we were merely asking them to con-

sider this, and not to decide on it now. I said we might

reasonably have now demanded a mart here, at Lhasa

itself, and in half a dozen other places, and I could not

permit them to refuse merely considering the question

suzerainty of Tibet. The Chinese suzerainty was fully

recognized in the Adhesion Agreement, which it was