国立情報学研究所 - ディジタル・シルクロード・プロジェクト
『東洋文庫所蔵』貴重書デジタルアーカイブ

> > > >
カラー New!IIIFカラー高解像度 白黒高解像度 PDF   日本語 English
0087 India and Tibet : vol.1
インドとチベット : vol.1
India and Tibet : vol.1 / 87 ページ(カラー画像)

New!引用情報

doi: 10.20676/00000295
引用形式選択: Chicago | APA | Harvard | IEEE

OCR読み取り結果

 

SUGGESTED OCCUPATION OF CHUMBI 61

delay, but it was plain that the Amban at Lhasa was

unable to give effect to the wishes of his Government in

consequence of the opposition manifested by the Lamas,

who exercised the real authority in 'Tibet. The contem-

plated withdrawal of Mr. White to Gantok would un-

doubtedly, he thought—and events proved him to be

absolutely right—cause a loss of prestige, would be looked

upon by the Tibetans as a rebuff to British authority, and

would encourage them in high-handed acts and demands,

and possibly outrages. He had no doubt that if the

British Government had only to deal with Tibet, the

wisest policy would be to give them warning that unless

they at once made arrangements to co-operate in the work

of delimitation it would be done without them, and that

unless they appointed a ruler on their side who could

protect the pillars set up, the British Government would

march in and hold the Chumbi Valley in pawn, either

temporarily or permanently. Such a brusque and high-

handed line of conduct, added the Lieutenant-Governor,

was the only one that frontier tribes who have reached the

stage of civilization of the Tibetans could understand. But

the affair, he allowed, was complicated by the relations of

Government with China, and our desire to uphold the

weak and tottering authority of the Chinese in Lhasa, the

result of which was that the people who were in real

power were not those we dealt with, and that the people

we dealt with had no power to carry out their engage-

ments with us. In the circumstances, Sir Charles Elliott

advocated such negotiations with the Chinese Govern-

ment as would leave the British Government free to

march in and hold the Chumbi Valley, with their consent,

and without any detriment to the Chinese suzerainty,

but with the object of assisting them to establish their

authority more firmly at Lhasa. At any rate, we ought,

he considered, to intimate in a firm and friendly way to

the Peking Government that either they must get their

orders carried out or we must. He reminded the

Government of India that nothing had been exacted as

the result of the British victories at Lengtu and on the

Jelap-la—not even compensation for the cost of the cam-